These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18829335)

  • 1. Evaluation of ligand-binding affinity using polynomial empirical scoring functions.
    de Azevedo WF; Dias R
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2008 Oct; 16(20):9378-82. PubMed ID: 18829335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data.
    Pearlman DA; Rao BG; Charifson P
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1519-38. PubMed ID: 18300249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational methods for calculation of ligand-binding affinity.
    de Azevedo WF; Dias R
    Curr Drug Targets; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1031-9. PubMed ID: 19128212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of molecular docking using polynomial empirical scoring functions.
    Dias R; Timmers LF; Caceres RA; de Azevedo WF
    Curr Drug Targets; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1062-70. PubMed ID: 19128216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LigScore: a novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities.
    Krammer A; Kirchhoff PD; Jiang X; Venkatachalam CM; Waldman M
    J Mol Graph Model; 2005 Apr; 23(5):395-407. PubMed ID: 15781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scoring ligand similarity in structure-based virtual screening.
    Zavodszky MI; Rohatgi A; Van Voorst JR; Yan H; Kuhn LA
    J Mol Recognit; 2009; 22(4):280-92. PubMed ID: 19235177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular modeling and dynamics simulations of PNP from Streptococcus agalactiae.
    Caceres RA; Saraiva Timmers LF; Dias R; Basso LA; Santos DS; de Azevedo WF
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2008 May; 16(9):4984-93. PubMed ID: 18381241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distance dependent scoring function for describing protein-ligand intermolecular interactions.
    Artemenko N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):569-74. PubMed ID: 18290639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 4. Are popular scoring functions accurate for this class of proteins?
    Englebienne P; Moitessier N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1568-80. PubMed ID: 19445499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards an integrated description of hydrogen bonding and dehydration: decreasing false positives in virtual screening with the HYDE scoring function.
    Reulecke I; Lange G; Albrecht J; Klein R; Rarey M
    ChemMedChem; 2008 Jun; 3(6):885-97. PubMed ID: 18384086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ID-Score: a new empirical scoring function based on a comprehensive set of descriptors related to protein-ligand interactions.
    Li GB; Yang LL; Wang WJ; Li LL; Yang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Mar; 53(3):592-600. PubMed ID: 23394072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. BHB: a simple knowledge-based scoring function to improve the efficiency of database screening.
    Feher M; Deretey E; Roy S
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(4):1316-27. PubMed ID: 12870925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structural studies of human purine nucleoside phosphorylase: towards a new specific empirical scoring function.
    Timmers LF; Caceres RA; Vivan AL; Gava LM; Dias R; Ducati RG; Basso LA; Santos DS; de Azevedo WF
    Arch Biochem Biophys; 2008 Nov; 479(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 18790691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structural artifacts in protein-ligand X-ray structures: implications for the development of docking scoring functions.
    Søndergaard CR; Garrett AE; Carstensen T; Pollastri G; Nielsen JE
    J Med Chem; 2009 Sep; 52(18):5673-84. PubMed ID: 19711919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical scoring functions for advanced protein-ligand docking with PLANTS.
    Korb O; Stützle T; Exner TE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jan; 49(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 19125657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SeleX-CS: a new consensus scoring algorithm for hit discovery and lead optimization.
    Bar-Haim S; Aharon A; Ben-Moshe T; Marantz Y; Senderowitz H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Mar; 49(3):623-33. PubMed ID: 19231809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unbiasing scoring functions: a new normalization and rescoring strategy.
    Carta G; Knox AJ; Lloyd DG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(4):1564-71. PubMed ID: 17552493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Position specific interaction dependent scoring technique for virtual screening based on weighted protein--ligand interaction fingerprint profiles.
    Nandigam RK; Kim S; Singh J; Chuaqui C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 May; 49(5):1185-92. PubMed ID: 19415918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hit identification and binding mode predictions by rigorous free energy simulations.
    Michel J; Essex JW
    J Med Chem; 2008 Nov; 51(21):6654-64. PubMed ID: 18834104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.