These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18831040)

  • 1. COCO: a simple tool to enrich the representation of conformational variability in NMR structures.
    Laughton CA; Orozco M; Vranken W
    Proteins; 2009 Apr; 75(1):206-16. PubMed ID: 18831040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Refinement of NMR structures using implicit solvent and advanced sampling techniques.
    Chen J; Im W; Brooks CL
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Dec; 126(49):16038-47. PubMed ID: 15584737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Refinement of NMR-determined protein structures with database derived mean-force potentials.
    Wu D; Jernigan R; Wu Z
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):232-42. PubMed ID: 17387736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structure and dynamics of the Abeta(21-30) peptide from the interplay of NMR experiments and molecular simulations.
    Fawzi NL; Phillips AH; Ruscio JZ; Doucleff M; Wemmer DE; Head-Gordon T
    J Am Chem Soc; 2008 May; 130(19):6145-58. PubMed ID: 18412346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneous single-structure and bundle representation of protein NMR structures in torsion angle space.
    Gottstein D; Kirchner DK; Güntert P
    J Biomol NMR; 2012 Apr; 52(4):351-64. PubMed ID: 22351031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian inference of protein conformational ensembles from limited structural data.
    Potrzebowski W; Trewhella J; Andre I
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Dec; 14(12):e1006641. PubMed ID: 30557358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A correspondence between solution-state dynamics of an individual protein and the sequence and conformational diversity of its family.
    Friedland GD; Lakomek NA; Griesinger C; Meiler J; Kortemme T
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 May; 5(5):e1000393. PubMed ID: 19478996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing atomistic simulation data with the NMR experiment: how much can NOEs actually tell us?
    Zagrovic B; van Gunsteren WF
    Proteins; 2006 Apr; 63(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 16425239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ensemble modeling of protein disordered states: experimental restraint contributions and validation.
    Marsh JA; Forman-Kay JD
    Proteins; 2012 Feb; 80(2):556-72. PubMed ID: 22095648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving NMR protein structure quality by Rosetta refinement: a molecular replacement study.
    Ramelot TA; Raman S; Kuzin AP; Xiao R; Ma LC; Acton TB; Hunt JF; Montelione GT; Baker D; Kennedy MA
    Proteins; 2009 Apr; 75(1):147-67. PubMed ID: 18816799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Molecular Dynamics Simulations Combined with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and/or Small-Angle X-ray Scattering Data for Characterizing Intrinsically Disordered Protein Conformational Ensembles.
    Chan-Yao-Chong M; Durand D; Ha-Duong T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 May; 59(5):1743-1758. PubMed ID: 30840442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CoCo-MD: A Simple and Effective Method for the Enhanced Sampling of Conformational Space.
    Shkurti A; Styliari ID; Balasubramanian V; Bethune I; Pedebos C; Jha S; Laughton CA
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2587-2596. PubMed ID: 30620585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An automated approach to network features of protein structure ensembles.
    Bhattacharyya M; Bhat CR; Vishveshwara S
    Protein Sci; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1399-416. PubMed ID: 23934896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of protein loop geometries in solution.
    Rapp CS; Strauss T; Nederveen A; Fuentes G
    Proteins; 2007 Oct; 69(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 17588228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Pseudocontact Shifts and Residual Dipolar Couplings as Exact NMR Restraints for the Determination of Protein Structural Ensembles.
    Camilloni C; Vendruscolo M
    Biochemistry; 2015 Dec; 54(51):7470-6. PubMed ID: 26624789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CoNSEnsX: an ensemble view of protein structures and NMR-derived experimental data.
    Angyán AF; Szappanos B; Perczel A; Gáspári Z
    BMC Struct Biol; 2010 Oct; 10():39. PubMed ID: 21034466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. RECOORD: a recalculated coordinate database of 500+ proteins from the PDB using restraints from the BioMagResBank.
    Nederveen AJ; Doreleijers JF; Vranken W; Miller Z; Spronk CA; Nabuurs SB; Güntert P; Livny M; Markley JL; Nilges M; Ulrich EL; Kaptein R; Bonvin AM
    Proteins; 2005 Jun; 59(4):662-72. PubMed ID: 15822098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Refinement of ensembles describing unstructured proteins using NMR residual dipolar couplings.
    Esteban-Martín S; Fenwick RB; Salvatella X
    J Am Chem Soc; 2010 Apr; 132(13):4626-32. PubMed ID: 20222664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protein NMR structures refined with Rosetta have higher accuracy relative to corresponding X-ray crystal structures.
    Mao B; Tejero R; Baker D; Montelione GT
    J Am Chem Soc; 2014 Feb; 136(5):1893-906. PubMed ID: 24392845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conformational Ensembles by NMR and MD Simulations in Model Heptapeptides with Select Tri-Peptide Motifs.
    Krishnan VV; Bentley T; Xiong A; Maitra K
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Jan; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 33573010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.