281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18831605)
1. Three-dimensional object shape from shading and contour disparities.
Nefs HT
J Vis; 2008 Aug; 8(11):11.1-16. PubMed ID: 18831605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of specular highlights on perceived surface convexity.
Adams WJ; Elder JH
PLoS Comput Biol; 2014 May; 10(5):e1003576. PubMed ID: 24811069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The perception of gloss depends on highlight congruence with surface shading.
Kim J; Marlow P; Anderson BL
J Vis; 2011 Aug; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 21841140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimal integration of shading and binocular disparity for depth perception.
Lovell PG; Bloj M; Harris JM
J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 22214563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stereoscopic shape discrimination is well preserved across changes in object size.
Norman JF; Swindle JM; Jennings LR; Mullins EM; Beers AM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jun; 131(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 19389660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Highlight-shading relationship as a cue for the perception of translucent and transparent materials.
Motoyoshi I
J Vis; 2010 Sep; 10(9):6. PubMed ID: 20884604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Disparity and shading cues cooperate for surface interpolation.
Vuong QC; Domini F; Caudek C
Perception; 2006; 35(2):145-55. PubMed ID: 16583761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stereo improves 3D shape discrimination even when rich monocular shape cues are available.
Lee YL; Saunders JA
J Vis; 2011 Aug; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 21849629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian combination of ambiguous shape cues.
Adams WJ; Mamassian P
J Vis; 2004 Nov; 4(10):921-9. PubMed ID: 15595895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monocular occlusions determine the perceived shape and depth of occluding surfaces.
Tsirlin I; Wilcox LM; Allison RS
J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):11. PubMed ID: 20884560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Qualitative shape from shading, highlights, and mirror reflections.
Faisman A; Langer MS
J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 23584631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The absence of depth constancy in contour stereograms.
Vreven D; Welch L
Perception; 2001; 30(6):693-705. PubMed ID: 11464558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Highlights, disparity, and perceived gloss with convex and concave surfaces.
Kerrigan IS; Adams WJ
J Vis; 2013 Jan; 13(1):9. PubMed ID: 23291649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of stereopsis, motion parallax, perspective and angle polarity in perceiving 3-D shape.
Sherman A; Papathomas TV; Jain A; Keane BP
Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(3-4):263-85. PubMed ID: 21771395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of viewing angle, camera angle, and sign of surface curvature on the perception of three-dimensional shape from texture.
Todd JT; Thaler L; Dijkstra TM; Koenderink JJ; Kappers AM
J Vis; 2007 Sep; 7(12):9.1-16. PubMed ID: 17997651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relative flattening between velvet and matte 3D shapes: evidence for similar shape-from-shading computations.
Wijntjes MW; Doerschner K; Kucukoglu G; Pont SC
J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 22214564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Shape-from-shading for matte and glossy objects.
Nefs HT; Koenderink JJ; Kappers AM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Mar; 121(3):297-316. PubMed ID: 16181604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of shape-from-shading information on the perception of global motion.
Khuu SK; Khambiye S
Vision Res; 2012 Feb; 55():1-10. PubMed ID: 22266194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Depth cues versus the simplicity principle in 3D shape perception.
Li Y; Pizlo Z
Top Cogn Sci; 2011 Oct; 3(4):667-85. PubMed ID: 25164504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Depth from shading and disparity in humans and monkeys.
Zhang Y; Weiner VS; Slocum WM; Schiller PH
Vis Neurosci; 2007; 24(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 17640412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
