These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Grouping of contextual elements that affect vernier thresholds. Malania M; Herzog MH; Westheimer G J Vis; 2007 Jan; 7(2):1.1-7. PubMed ID: 18217816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vernier acuity for stereodisparate objects and ocular prevalence. Heinrich SP; Kromeier M; Bach M; Kommerell G Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(10):1321-8. PubMed ID: 15733964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Vernier acuity in barn owls. Harmening WM; Göbbels K; Wagner H Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(7):1020-6. PubMed ID: 17316738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of age and optical blur on real depth stereoacuity. Costa MF; Moreira SM; Hamer RD; Ventura DF Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Sep; 30(5):660-6. PubMed ID: 20883352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of luminance and contrast on stereoscopic acuity. Geib T; Baumann C Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1990; 228(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 2401413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of cue context on the perception of depth from combined disparity and perspective cues. Harwerth RS; Moeller MC; Wensveen JM Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Jun; 75(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 9661212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis. Grove PM; Brooks KR; Anderson BL; Gillam BJ Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1695-705; discussion 1706. PubMed ID: 16009392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the effects of ageing upon vernier and bisection acuity. Garcia-Suarez L; Barrett BT; Pacey I Vision Res; 2004 May; 44(10):1039-45. PubMed ID: 15031098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binocular capture: the effects of spatial frequency and contrast polarity of the monocular target. Raghunandan A Vision Res; 2011 Dec; 51(23-24):2369-77. PubMed ID: 21982870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of chromaticity on vernier and stereo acuity. Krauskopf J; Forte JD J Vis; 2002; 2(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 12678635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence for elongated receptive field structure for mechanisms subserving stereopsis. Chen CC; Tyler CW Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(17):2691-702. PubMed ID: 16580041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation: effects of stimulus spatial frequency and eccentricity. Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS Behav Brain Res; 2005 May; 160(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15836903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The structure of stereoscopic masking: position, disparity, and size tuning. Tyler CW; Kontsevich LL Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(25-26):3096-108. PubMed ID: 16168458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Binocular processes in vernier acuity. Mussap AJ; Levi DM J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1995 Feb; 12(2):225-33. PubMed ID: 7869153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A normative dataset on human global stereopsis using the quick Disparity Sensitivity Function (qDSF). Reynaud A; Gao Y; Hess RF Vision Res; 2015 Aug; 113(Pt A):97-103. PubMed ID: 26028556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Local binocular fusion is involved in global binocular rivalry. Takase S; Yukumatsu S; Bingushi K Vision Res; 2008 Aug; 48(17):1798-803. PubMed ID: 18585751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamics of the influence of segmentation cues on orientation perception. Durant S; Clifford CW Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):2934-40. PubMed ID: 16707146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]