These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18832075)

  • 1. Eye gaze during comprehension of American Sign Language by native and beginning signers.
    Emmorey K; Thompson R; Colvin R
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2009; 14(2):237-43. PubMed ID: 18832075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers.
    Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):170-81. PubMed ID: 12027401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of spatial attention on motion processing in deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners.
    Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):152-69. PubMed ID: 12027400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Eye fixations of deaf and hearing observers in simultaneous communication perception.
    De Filippo CL; Lansing CR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):331-52. PubMed ID: 16825884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of sign language and its application to visual communications for deaf people.
    Muir LJ; Richardson IE
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(4):390-401. PubMed ID: 16000689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners' gestures without speech.
    Schembri A; Jones C; Burnham D
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(3):272-90. PubMed ID: 15858072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement.
    Cattani A; Clibbens J; Perfect TJ
    Neuropsychology; 2007 Jan; 21(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 17201534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An Eye Tracking Study on the Perception and Comprehension of Unimodal and Bimodal Linguistic Inputs by Deaf Adolescents.
    Mastrantuono E; Saldaña D; Rodríguez-Ortiz IR
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1044. PubMed ID: 28680416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Motion velocity thresholds in deaf signers: changes in lateralization but not in overall sensitivity.
    Brozinsky CJ; Bavelier D
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 21(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15325408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Atypical lateralization of memory for location: effects of deafness and sign language use.
    Cattani A; Clibbens J
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Jul; 58(2):226-39. PubMed ID: 15919555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural correlates of British sign language comprehension: spatial processing demands of topographic language.
    MacSweeney M; Woll B; Campbell R; Calvert GA; McGuire PK; David AS; Simmons A; Brammer MJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):1064-75. PubMed ID: 12419129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Real-time lexical comprehension in young children learning American Sign Language.
    MacDonald K; LaMarr T; Corina D; Marchman VA; Fernald A
    Dev Sci; 2018 Nov; 21(6):e12672. PubMed ID: 29659103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of age on the temporal organization of working memory in deaf signers.
    Rudner M; Davidsson L; Ronnberg J
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2010 May; 17(3):360-83. PubMed ID: 19921581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The neural correlates of highly iconic structures and topographic discourse in French Sign Language as observed in six hearing native signers.
    Courtin C; Hervé PY; Petit L; Zago L; Vigneau M; Beaucousin V; Jobard G; Mazoyer B; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Brain Lang; 2010 Sep; 114(3):180-92. PubMed ID: 20542548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Iconicity in spatial language guides visual attention: A comparison between signers' and speakers' eye gaze during message preparation.
    Manhardt F; Özyürek A; Sümer B; Mulder K; Karadöller DZ; Brouwer S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1735-1753. PubMed ID: 32352819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Video Reversal on Gaze Patterns during Signed Narrative Comprehension.
    Bosworth R; Stone A; Hwang SO
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2020 May; 25(3):283-297. PubMed ID: 32427289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Seeing speech and seeing sign: insights from a fMRI study.
    Campbell R; Capek C
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov; 47 Suppl 2():S3-9. PubMed ID: 19012106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sign language experience redistributes attentional resources to the inferior visual field.
    Stoll C; Dye MWG
    Cognition; 2019 Oct; 191():103957. PubMed ID: 31255921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric organization of local- and global-level visuospatial processes in deaf signers and its relation to sign language aphasia.
    Hickok G; Kirk K; Bellugi U
    Brain Lang; 1998 Nov; 65(2):276-86. PubMed ID: 9784271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of early deafness and early exposure to sign language on the cerebral organization for motion processing.
    Bavelier D; Brozinsky C; Tomann A; Mitchell T; Neville H; Liu G
    J Neurosci; 2001 Nov; 21(22):8931-42. PubMed ID: 11698604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.