These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18832388)

  • 21. Re: "A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods".
    Olkin I
    Am J Epidemiol; 1994 Aug; 140(3):297-9; discussion 300-1. PubMed ID: 8048979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. On pooled and stratified analysis of epidemiologic rates.
    Nurminen M
    Public Health Rev; 1988; 16(3-4):163-87. PubMed ID: 3272013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. What have we learned from meta-analysis?
    Stockler M; Coates A
    Med J Aust; 1993 Sep; 159(5):291-3. PubMed ID: 8361419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Commentary: like it and lump it? Meta-analysis using individual participant data.
    Riley RD
    Int J Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 39(5):1359-61. PubMed ID: 20660642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A guide to understanding meta-analysis.
    Israel H; Richter RR
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2011 Jul; 41(7):496-504. PubMed ID: 21725192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quasi-empirical Bayes methodology for improving meta-analysis.
    Saleh AK; Hassanein KM; Hassanein RS; Kim HM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 16440838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Meta-analysis and evidence.
    Goodman SN
    Control Clin Trials; 1989 Jun; 10(2):188-204. PubMed ID: 2666026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Issues regarding systematic review reports and trial heterogeneity.
    Meads C; Sheffield D
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 2005 Jun; 193(6):424-5; author reply 425-6. PubMed ID: 15920385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Statistical analyses for studying replication: Meta-analytic perspectives.
    Hedges LV; Schauer JM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Oct; 24(5):557-570. PubMed ID: 30070547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The likelihood ratio versus the p value in meta-analysis: where is the evidence? Comment on the paper by S. N. Goodman.
    Zucker D; Yusuf S
    Control Clin Trials; 1989 Jun; 10(2):205-8; discussion 209-10. PubMed ID: 2666027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Methods for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Song F; Sheldon TA; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR; Jones DR
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Jun; 24(2):126-51. PubMed ID: 11523383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Performing and evaluating meta-analyses.
    Burcharth J; Pommergaard HC; Rosenberg J
    Surgery; 2015 Feb; 157(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 25304841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Label-invariant models for the analysis of meta-epidemiological data.
    Rhodes KM; Mawdsley D; Turner RM; Jones HE; Savović J; Higgins JPT
    Stat Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 28929507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Meta-analysis: reconciling the results of independent studies.
    Olkin I
    Stat Med; 1995 Mar 15-Apr 15; 14(5-7):457-72. PubMed ID: 7792440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Meta-analysis: fact or fiction? How to interpret meta-analyses.
    Huf W; Kalcher K; Pail G; Friedrich ME; Filzmoser P; Kasper S
    World J Biol Psychiatry; 2011 Apr; 12(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 21375365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Selecting the best meta-analytic estimator for evidence-based practice: a simulation study.
    Doi SAR; Furuya-Kanamori L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2020 Mar; 18(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 31764215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Heterogeneity in ecological and evolutionary meta-analyses: its magnitude and implications.
    Senior AM; Grueber CE; Kamiya T; Lagisz M; O'Dwyer K; Santos ES; Nakagawa S
    Ecology; 2016 Dec; 97(12):3293-3299. PubMed ID: 27912008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Meta-analysis: different methods--different conclusions?
    Böckenhoff A; Hartung J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():39-43. PubMed ID: 11187581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Commentary: Which meta-analyses are conclusive?
    Nüesch E; Jüni P
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):298-303. PubMed ID: 19074491
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Meta-analysis for orthodontists: Part I--How to choose effect measure and statistical model.
    Papageorgiou SN
    J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):317-26. PubMed ID: 25404668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.