These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18832487)
1. Cyclical loading of coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions: a comparative biomechanical study. Lee SJ; Keefer EP; McHugh MP; Kremenic IJ; Orishimo KF; Ben-Avi S; Nicholas SJ Am J Sports Med; 2008 Oct; 36(10):1990-7. PubMed ID: 18832487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Semitendinosus tendon graft versus a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in chronic cases: a prospective comparative study. Tauber M; Gordon K; Koller H; Fox M; Resch H Am J Sports Med; 2009 Jan; 37(1):181-90. PubMed ID: 18818433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel reverse coracoacromial ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular joint separation. Shu B; Johnston T; Lindsey DP; McAdams TR Am J Sports Med; 2012 Feb; 40(2):440-6. PubMed ID: 22085727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical comparison of acromioclavicular joint reconstructions using coracoclavicular tendon grafts with and without coracoacromial ligament transfer. Clevenger T; Vance RE; Bachus KN; Burks RT; Tashjian RZ Arthroscopy; 2011 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 20950988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic repairs for acromioclavicular joint instability: suture button systems without biological augmentation. Beitzel K; Obopilwe E; Chowaniec DM; Niver GE; Nowak MD; Hanypsiak BT; Guerra JJ; Arciero RA; Mazzocca AD Am J Sports Med; 2011 Oct; 39(10):2218-25. PubMed ID: 21841067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Mazzocca AD; Santangelo SA; Johnson ST; Rios CG; Dumonski ML; Arciero RA Am J Sports Med; 2006 Feb; 34(2):236-46. PubMed ID: 16282577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical rationale for development of anatomical reconstructions of coracoclavicular ligaments after complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Costic RS; Labriola JE; Rodosky MW; Debski RE Am J Sports Med; 2004 Dec; 32(8):1929-36. PubMed ID: 15572323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anatomical acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of reconstructive techniques of the acromioclavicular joint. Grutter PW; Petersen SA Am J Sports Med; 2005 Nov; 33(11):1723-8. PubMed ID: 16093536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of reconstruction techniques for disruption of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments. Pearsall AW; Hollis JM; Russell GV; Stokes DA J South Orthop Assoc; 2002; 11(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 12741581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A biomechanical analysis of the native coracoclavicular ligaments and their influence on a new reconstruction using a coracoid tunnel and free tendon graft. Yoo YS; Tsai AG; Ranawat AS; Bansal M; Fu FH; Rodosky MW; Smolinski P Arthroscopy; 2010 Sep; 26(9):1153-61. PubMed ID: 20810076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of a modified Weaver-Dunn and a free-tissue graft reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint complex. Michlitsch MG; Adamson GJ; Pink M; Estess A; Shankwiler JA; Lee TQ Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jun; 38(6):1196-203. PubMed ID: 20351202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of an augmented coracoacromial ligament transfer for acromioclavicular joint instability. Wellmann M; Lodde I; Schanz S; Zantop T; Raschke MJ; Petersen W Arthroscopy; 2008 Dec; 24(12):1395-401. PubMed ID: 19038711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical analysis of medial collateral ligament reconstruction grafts of the elbow. Prud'homme J; Budoff JE; Nguyen L; Hipp JA Am J Sports Med; 2008 Apr; 36(4):728-32. PubMed ID: 18182653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments with tendon grafts: a comparative biomechanical study. Lee SJ; Nicholas SJ; Akizuki KH; McHugh MP; Kremenic IJ; Ben-Avi S Am J Sports Med; 2003; 31(5):648-55. PubMed ID: 12975181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Synthetic coracoclavicular ligament vs. coracoclavicular suspensory construct for treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation: a biomechanical study. Lobao MH; Canham RB; Melvani RT; Parks BG; Murthi AM J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1440-1449. PubMed ID: 32081633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of the acromioclavicular capsular ligaments and reconstruction with an intramedullary free tissue graft. Freedman JA; Adamson GJ; Bui C; Lee TQ Am J Sports Med; 2010 May; 38(5):958-64. PubMed ID: 20139471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Single- Versus Double-Tunnel Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction With Acromioclavicular Stabilization for Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries. Banffy MB; Uquillas C; Neumann JA; ElAttrache NS Am J Sports Med; 2018 Apr; 46(5):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 29438625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mechanics of coracoacromial ligament transfer augmentation for acromioclavicular joint injuries. Wilson DR; Moses JM; Zilberfarb JL; Hayes WC J Biomech; 2005 Mar; 38(3):615-9. PubMed ID: 15652562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]