56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18833820)
1. Concordance between original screening and final diagnosis using imager vs. manual screen of cervical liquid-based cytology slides.
Pacheco MC; Conley RC; Pennington DW; Bishop JW
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(5):575-8. PubMed ID: 18833820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of ThinPrep Imager-assisted with manual screening, and its place in the New Zealand cervical cancer screening program.
Yeong ML; Pringle E; Stewart J; Retter E
Pathology; 2013 Aug; 45(5):474-7. PubMed ID: 23856838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of cellularity on the sensitivity of detecting squamous lesions in liquid-based cervical cytology.
Studeman KD; Ioffe OB; Puszkiewicz J; Sauvegeot J; Henry MR
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(4):605-10. PubMed ID: 12920754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System.
Biscotti CV; Dawson AE; Dziura B; Galup L; Darragh T; Rahemtulla A; Wills-Frank L
Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb; 123(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 15842055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implementation of pre-captured videos for remote diagnosis of cervical cytology specimens.
Archondakis S; Roma M; Kaladelfou E
Cytopathology; 2021 May; 32(3):338-343. PubMed ID: 33368677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of the CytoRich monolayer preparation system for cervical cytology. A prelude to automated primary screening.
Takahashi M; Naito M
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(6):1785-9. PubMed ID: 9390142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of fluid-based, thin-layer processing and conventional Papanicolaou methods for uterine cervical cytology.
Wang TY; Chen HS; Yang YC; Tsou MC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1999 Jul; 98(7):500-5. PubMed ID: 10463000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeating cytological preparations on liquid-based cytology samples: A methodological advantage?
Pinto AP; Maia HF; di Loretto C; Krunn P; Túlio S; Collaço LM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):663-9. PubMed ID: 17854084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of ThinPrep Integrated Imager-Assisted Screening versus Manual Screening of ThinPrep Liquid-Based Cytology Specimens.
Tanaka K; Aoki D; Tozawa-Ono A; Suzuki N; Takamatsu K; Nakamura M; Tsunoda H; Seino S; Kobayashi N; Shirayama T; Takahashi F
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(5):486-491. PubMed ID: 32535593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Liquid-based cervical cytology ThinPrep screening in Hungary].
Bak M; Séberné Éll M; Bóka M; Veleczki Z; Nyári T; Pete I; Szentirmay Z
Orv Hetil; 2014 May; 155(18):708-14. PubMed ID: 24776385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implementation of the ThinPrep imaging system in a high-volume metropolitan laboratory.
Miller FS; Nagel LE; Kenny-Moynihan MB
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Apr; 35(4):213-7. PubMed ID: 17351933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Study of a manual method of liquid-based cervical cytology.
Kavatkar AN; Nagwanshi CA; Dabak SM
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2008; 51(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 18603678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Bethesda Interobserver Reproducibility Study (BIRST): a web-based assessment of the Bethesda 2001 System for classifying cervical cytology.
Sherman ME; Dasgupta A; Schiffman M; Nayar R; Solomon D
Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 17186503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of manual and automated methods of liquid-based cytology. A morphologic study.
Alves VA; Bibbo M; Schmitt FC; Milanezi F; Longatto Filho A
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 15085750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detection of unsuspected abnormalities by PAPNET-assisted review.
Mitchell H; Medley G
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):260-4. PubMed ID: 9479349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementation and evaluation of a new automated interactive image analysis system.
Bolger N; Heffron C; Regan I; Sweeney M; Kinsella S; McKeown M; Creighton G; Russell J; O'Leary J
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(5):483-91. PubMed ID: 17017432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the ThinPrep Imaging System for internal quality control of cervical cytology.
Heard T; Chandra A; Culora G; Gupta SS; Herbert A; Morgan M
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):246-53. PubMed ID: 22937891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Applicative aspects of liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer screening].
Liverani M; De Paola F; Danesi S; Fedriga R; Dalbuoni V; Agnoletti R; Amadori AR; Mirra F; Bonoli W; Saragoni L
Pathologica; 2006 Dec; 98(6):629-34. PubMed ID: 17285839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
