These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Recommendations for the reporting of pleural mesothelioma. Butnor KJ; Sporn TA; Ordonez NG; Hum Pathol; 2007 Nov; 38(11):1587-9. PubMed ID: 17276491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detecting and preventing the occurrence of errors in the practices of laboratory medicine and anatomic pathology: 15 years' experience with the College of American Pathologists' Q-PROBES and Q-TRACKS programs. Novis DA Clin Lab Med; 2004 Dec; 24(4):965-78. PubMed ID: 15555751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Requirements for accreditation by the College of American Pathologists Laboratory Accreditation Program. Hamlin WB Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1999 Jun; 123(6):465-7. PubMed ID: 10383793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interinstitutional comparison of surgical biopsy diagnosis turnaround time: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 5384 surgical biopsies in 157 small hospitals. Novis DA; Zarbo RJ; Saladino AJ Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Nov; 122(11):951-6. PubMed ID: 9822122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adequacy of surgical pathology reporting of cancer: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 86 institutions. Idowu MO; Bekeris LG; Raab S; Ruby SG; Nakhleh RE Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Jul; 134(7):969-74. PubMed ID: 20586623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens. Zarbo RJ; Gephardt GN; Howanitz PJ Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Mar; 120(3):234-44. PubMed ID: 8629897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Challenges and opportunities in the adoption of College of American Pathologists checklists in electronic format: perspectives and experience of Reporting Pathology Protocols Project (RPP2) participant laboratories. Hassell LA; Parwani AV; Weiss L; Jones MA; Ye J Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Aug; 134(8):1152-9. PubMed ID: 20670135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Q-tracks: a College of American Pathologists program of continuous laboratory monitoring and longitudinal tracking. Zarbo RJ; Jones BA; Friedberg RC; Valenstein PN; Renner SW; Schifman RB; Walsh MK; Howanitz PJ Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2002 Sep; 126(9):1036-44. PubMed ID: 12204052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are College of American pathologists accreditation standards relevant outside North America? Obenson K; James D Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Oct; 127(10):1248. PubMed ID: 14521473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Proficiency testing. Its role in a voluntary clinical Laboratory Accreditation Program. Duckworth JK Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1988 Apr; 112(4):346-8. PubMed ID: 3355330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Significant and unexpected, and critical diagnoses in surgical pathology: a College of American Pathologists' survey of 1130 laboratories. Nakhleh RE; Souers R; Brown RW Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2009 Sep; 133(9):1375-8. PubMed ID: 19722742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions. Nakhleh RE; Jones B; Zarbo RJ Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Jan; 121(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 9111087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Customer satisfaction in anatomic pathology. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 3065 physician surveys from 94 laboratories. Zarbo RJ; Nakhleh RE; Walsh M; Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2003 Jan; 127(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12521362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accreditation of Individualized Quality Control Plans by the College of American Pathologists. Hoeltge GA Clin Lab Med; 2017 Mar; 37(1):151-162. PubMed ID: 28153363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]