These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1883423)

  • 21. Borderline grades in high stakes clinical examinations: resolving examiner uncertainty.
    Shulruf B; Adelstein BA; Damodaran A; Harris P; Kennedy S; O'Sullivan A; Taylor S
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Nov; 18(1):272. PubMed ID: 30458741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Modifying Hofstee standard setting for assessments that vary in difficulty, and to determine boundaries for different levels of achievement.
    Burr SA; Whittle J; Fairclough LC; Coombes L; Todd I
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Jan; 16():34. PubMed ID: 26821741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sources of variation in performance on a shared OSCE station across four UK medical schools.
    Chesser A; Cameron H; Evans P; Cleland J; Boursicot K; Mires G
    Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):526-32. PubMed ID: 19493176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Setting and validating the pass/fail score for the NBDHE.
    Tsai TH; Dixon BL
    J Dent Hyg; 2013 Apr; 87(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 23986142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validating the standard for the National Board Dental Examination Part II.
    Tsai TH; Neumann LM; Littlefield JH
    J Dent Educ; 2012 May; 76(5):540-4. PubMed ID: 22550099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of a medicine clerkship conference series on students' acquisition of knowledge.
    Magarian GJ
    Acad Med; 1993 Dec; 68(12):923-6. PubMed ID: 8259966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predictors of medical school clerkship performance: a multispecialty longitudinal analysis of standardized examination scores and clinical assessments.
    Casey PM; Palmer BA; Thompson GB; Laack TA; Thomas MR; Hartz MF; Jensen JR; Sandefur BJ; Hammack JE; Swanson JW; Sheeler RD; Grande JP
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Apr; 16():128. PubMed ID: 27121276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of acute test anxiety on NBME Part I performance.
    Frierson HT; Hoban JD
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 84(8):686-9. PubMed ID: 1507259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of two standard-setting approaches in high-stakes clinical performance assessment using generalizability theory.
    Richter Lagha RA; Boscardin CK; May W; Fung CC
    Acad Med; 2012 Aug; 87(8):1077-82. PubMed ID: 22722349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Standard setting of script concordance tests using an adapted Nedelsky approach.
    Linn AM; Tonkin A; Duggan P
    Med Teach; 2013 Apr; 35(4):314-9. PubMed ID: 23228081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How interruptions in students' medical education affect their clinical performance evaluations.
    Kalishman S; Santo-Gomez L
    Acad Med; 1990 Nov; 65(11):704-5. PubMed ID: 2102102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of students in medicine clerkships.
    Magarian GJ; Mazur DJ
    Acad Med; 1990 May; 65(5):341-5. PubMed ID: 2337439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Results of the initial administrations of the NBME comprehensive Part I and Part II examinations.
    Becker DF; Swanson DB; Case SM; Nungester RJ
    Acad Med; 1992 Oct; 67(10 Suppl):S16-8. PubMed ID: 1388542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Standard Setting Methods for Pass/Fail Decisions on High-Stakes Objective Structured Clinical Examinations: A Validity Study.
    Yousuf N; Violato C; Zuberi RW
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(3):280-91. PubMed ID: 26158330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of One Versus Two Content-Specific Modules on American Board of Family Medicine Certification Examination Scores.
    O'Neill TR; Peabody MR
    J Am Board Fam Med; 2017 Jan; 30(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 28062821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Six years of comprehensive, clinical, performance-based assessment using standardized patients at the Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
    Vu NV; Barrows HS; Marcy ML; Verhulst SJ; Colliver JA; Travis T
    Acad Med; 1992 Jan; 67(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 1729994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Testing and evaluation: the present and future of the assessment of medical professionals.
    Haist SA; Butler AP; Paniagua MA
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2017 Mar; 41(1):149-153. PubMed ID: 28235753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Panel expertise for an Angoff standard setting procedure in progress testing: item writers compared to recently graduated students.
    Verhoeven BH; Verwijnen GM; Muijtjens AM; Scherpbier AJ; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 2002 Sep; 36(9):860-7. PubMed ID: 12354249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Who will pass the dental OSCE? Comparison of the Angoff and the borderline regression standard setting methods.
    Schoonheim-Klein M; Muijtjens A; Habets L; Manogue M; van der Vleuten C; van der Velden U
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2009 Aug; 13(3):162-71. PubMed ID: 19630935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of the NBME Comprehensive Basic Science Examination as a progress test in the preclerkship curriculum of a new medical school.
    Johnson TR; Khalil MK; Peppler RD; Davey DD; Kibble JD
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Dec; 38(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 25434014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.