112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18834513)
61. The promise and perils of microarray analysis.
Catherino WH; Leppert PC; Segars JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):389-93. PubMed ID: 16643826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Asthma-predictive genetic markers in gene expression profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells.
Shin SW; Oh TJ; Park SM; Park JS; Jang AS; Park SW; Uh ST; An S; Park CS
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res; 2011 Oct; 3(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 21966607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. A simple approach to ranking differentially expressed gene expression time courses through Gaussian process regression.
Kalaitzis AA; Lawrence ND
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 May; 12():180. PubMed ID: 21599902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Multiplex meta-analysis of RNA expression to identify genes with variants associated with immune dysfunction.
Morgan AA; Pyrgos VJ; Nadeau KC; Williamson PR; Butte AJ
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2012; 19(2):284-8. PubMed ID: 22319178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Publishing on genes and lymphoma in the era of "big science".
Wang S
Leuk Lymphoma; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2091-2. PubMed ID: 17990173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Intertwining threshold settings, biological data and database knowledge to optimize the selection of differentially expressed genes from microarray.
Chuchana P; Holzmuller P; Vezilier F; Berthier D; Chantal I; Severac D; Lemesre JL; Cuny G; Nirdé P; Bucheton B
PLoS One; 2010 Oct; 5(10):e13518. PubMed ID: 20976008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Defining signal thresholds in DNA microarrays: exemplary application for invasive cancer.
Bilban M; Buehler LK; Head S; Desoye G; Quaranta V
BMC Genomics; 2002 Jul; 3(1):19. PubMed ID: 12123529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Balancing false discovery and false negative rates in selection of differentially expressed genes in microarrays.
Park BS; Mori M
Open Access Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 2010(2):1-9. PubMed ID: 22022206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Comparison of statistical data models for identifying differentially expressed genes using a generalized likelihood ratio test.
Seng KY; Glenny RW; Madtes DK; Spilker ME; Vicini P; Gharib SA
Gene Regul Syst Bio; 2008; 2():125-139. PubMed ID: 19119428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. A new class of mixture models for differential gene expression in DNA microarray data.
Chen MH; Ibrahim JG; Chi YY
J Stat Plan Inference; 2008 Feb; 138(2):387-404. PubMed ID: 19672331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. TESTING SIGNIFICANCE OF FEATURES BY LASSOED PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS.
Witten DM; Tibshirani R
Ann Appl Stat; 2008 Sep; 2(3):986-1012. PubMed ID: 19756232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The clinical meaning of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve for the evaluation of the performance of disease markers.
Parodi S; Verda D; Bagnasco F; Muselli M
Epidemiol Health; 2022; 44():e2022088. PubMed ID: 36265519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Prognostic signatures associated with high infiltration of Tregs in bone metastatic prostate cancer.
Meng F; Han X; Min Z; He X; Zhu S
Aging (Albany NY); 2021 Jul; 13(13):17442-17461. PubMed ID: 34229299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The length of the receiver operating characteristic curve and the two cutoff Youden index within a robust framework for discovery, evaluation, and cutoff estimation in biomarker studies involving improper receiver operating characteristic curves.
Bantis LE; Tsimikas JV; Chambers GR; Capello M; Hanash S; Feng Z
Stat Med; 2021 Mar; 40(7):1767-1789. PubMed ID: 33530129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Comprehensive genomic and immunophenotypic analysis of CD4 T cell infiltrating human triple-negative breast cancer.
Zhang H; Qin G; Yu H; Han X; Zhu S
Cancer Immunol Immunother; 2021 Jun; 70(6):1649-1665. PubMed ID: 33301062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. An Ensemble Feature Selection Method for Biomarker Discovery.
Shahrjooihaghighi A; Frigui H; Zhang X; Wei X; Shi B; Trabelsi A
Proc IEEE Int Symp Signal Proc Inf Tech; 2017 Dec; 2017():416-421. PubMed ID: 30887013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Not proper ROC curves as new tool for the analysis of differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments.
Parodi S; Pistoia V; Muselli M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():410. PubMed ID: 18834513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Arrow plot: a new graphical tool for selecting up and down regulated genes and genes differentially expressed on sample subgroups.
Silva-Fortes C; Amaral Turkman MA; Sousa L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jun; 13():147. PubMed ID: 22734592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. A spline function approach for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray data analysis.
He W
Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(17):2954-63. PubMed ID: 15180936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
