241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18834715)
1. AHRQ series paper 1: comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.
Slutsky J; Atkins D; Chang S; Sharp BA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):481-3. PubMed ID: 18834715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. AHRQ series commentary 3: the United States addresses comparative effectiveness but not cost-effectiveness through the effective health-care program.
Freemantle N; Drummond MF
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):479-80. PubMed ID: 20346862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.
Whitlock EP; Lopez SA; Chang S; Helfand M; Eder M; Floyd N
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):491-501. PubMed ID: 19540721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.
Chou R; Aronson N; Atkins D; Ismaila AS; Santaguida P; Smith DH; Whitlock E; Wilt TJ; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):502-12. PubMed ID: 18823754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AHRQ series paper 2: principles for developing guidance: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.
Helfand M; Balshem H
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):484-90. PubMed ID: 19716268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) effective health care (EHC) program methods guide for comparative effectiveness reviews: keeping up-to-date in a rapidly evolving field.
Chang SM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1166-7. PubMed ID: 21959053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. AHRQ series commentary 1: rating the evidence in comparative effectiveness reviews.
Falck-Ytter Y; Schünemann H; Guyatt G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):474-5. PubMed ID: 20189352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions--agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program.
Owens DK; Lohr KN; Atkins D; Treadwell JR; Reston JT; Bass EB; Chang S; Helfand M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):513-23. PubMed ID: 19595577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
Relevo R; Balshem H
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1168-77. PubMed ID: 21684115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
Atkins D; Chang SM; Gartlehner G; Buckley DI; Whitlock EP; Berliner E; Matchar D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1198-207. PubMed ID: 21463926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Databases for outcomes research: what has 10 years of experience taught us?
Bosco L
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2001; 10(5):445-55. PubMed ID: 11802591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
Fu R; Gartlehner G; Grant M; Shamliyan T; Sedrakyan A; Wilt TJ; Griffith L; Oremus M; Raina P; Ismaila A; Santaguida P; Lau J; Trikalinos TA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1187-97. PubMed ID: 21477993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
Manchikanti L
Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AHRQ series commentary 2: informative, timely, and valuable: an outsider view of the comparative effectiveness review articles.
Tovey D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):476-8. PubMed ID: 20346861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Observational studies in systematic [corrected] reviews of comparative effectiveness: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
Norris SL; Atkins D; Bruening W; Fox S; Johnson E; Kane R; Morton SC; Oremus M; Ospina M; Randhawa G; Schoelles K; Shekelle P; Viswanathan M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1178-86. PubMed ID: 21636246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AHRQ series editorial: public involvement improves methods development in comparative effectiveness reviews.
Helfand M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):471-3. PubMed ID: 20346860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. AHRQ begins first phase of intervention reviews.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2005 Sep; 12(9):106-7. PubMed ID: 16161480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Alternative methods for formal literature review and meta-analysis in AHCPR Patient Outcomes Research Teams. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
Powe NR; Turner JA; Maklan CW; Ersek M
Med Care; 1994 Jul; 32(7 Suppl):JS22-37. PubMed ID: 8028411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the impact of systematic reviews on future research: two case studies.
Viswanathan M; Nerz P; Dalberth B; Voisin C; Lohr KN; Tant E; Jonas DE; Carey T
J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Jul; 1(4):329-46. PubMed ID: 24237467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
