These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18834898)

  • 1. Bayesian surprise attracts human attention.
    Itti L; Baldi P
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1295-306. PubMed ID: 18834898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Of bits and wows: A Bayesian theory of surprise with applications to attention.
    Baldi P; Itti L
    Neural Netw; 2010 Jun; 23(5):649-66. PubMed ID: 20080025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The surprise-attention link: a review.
    Horstmann G
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():106-15. PubMed ID: 25682693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automatic computation of an image's statistical surprise predicts performance of human observers on a natural image detection task.
    Mundhenk TN; Einhäuser W; Itti L
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(13):1620-37. PubMed ID: 19351543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electroencephalographic correlates of temporal Bayesian belief updating and surprise.
    Visalli A; Capizzi M; Ambrosini E; Kopp B; Vallesi A
    Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117867. PubMed ID: 33592246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eye movements reveal epistemic curiosity in human observers.
    Baranes A; Oudeyer PY; Gottlieb J
    Vision Res; 2015 Dec; 117():81-90. PubMed ID: 26518743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical decision theory to relate neurons to behavior in the study of covert visual attention.
    Eckstein MP; Peterson MF; Pham BT; Droll JA
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1097-128. PubMed ID: 19138699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simple summation rule for optimal fixation selection in visual search.
    Najemnik J; Geisler WS
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1286-94. PubMed ID: 19138697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting visual fixations on video based on low-level visual features.
    Le Meur O; Le Callet P; Barba D
    Vision Res; 2007 Sep; 47(19):2483-98. PubMed ID: 17688904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal stimulus properties that attract gaze to the periphery and repel gaze from fixation.
    Schütz AC; Lossin F; Kerzel D
    J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):6. PubMed ID: 23568849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magic, Bayes and wows: A Bayesian account of magic tricks.
    Grassi PR; Bartels A
    Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2021 Jul; 126():515-527. PubMed ID: 33838209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surprise attracts the eyes and binds the gaze.
    Horstmann G; Herwig A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Jun; 22(3):743-9. PubMed ID: 25199467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical modelling of gaze behaviour as categorical time series: what you should watch to save soccer penalties.
    Button C; Dicks M; Haines R; Barker R; Davids K
    Cogn Process; 2011 Aug; 12(3):235-44. PubMed ID: 21140189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Properties of human eye-head gaze shifts in an anti-gaze shift task.
    Chapman BB; Corneil BD
    Vision Res; 2008 Feb; 48(4):538-48. PubMed ID: 18166209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trial-by-trial surprise-decoding model for visual and auditory binary oddball tasks.
    Modirshanechi A; Kiani MM; Aghajan H
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 196():302-317. PubMed ID: 30980899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in the functional visual field during search with and without eye movements.
    Motter BC; Simoni DA
    Vision Res; 2008 Oct; 48(22):2382-93. PubMed ID: 18722398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novelty biases attention and gaze in a surprise trial.
    Horstmann G; Herwig A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jan; 78(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 26486643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differential influence of attention on gaze and head movements.
    Khan AZ; Blohm G; McPeek RM; Lefèvre P
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Jan; 101(1):198-206. PubMed ID: 18987122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The relation between gaze behavior and categorization: does where we look determine what we see?
    Hartendorp MO; Van der Stigchel S; Hooge I; Mostert J; de Boer T; Postma A
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(6):. PubMed ID: 23674580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What stands out in a scene? A study of human explicit saliency judgment.
    Borji A; Sihite DN; Itti L
    Vision Res; 2013 Oct; 91():62-77. PubMed ID: 23954536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.