These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18834975)

  • 1. Effects of language experience on the perception of American Sign Language.
    Morford JP; Grieve-Smith AB; MacFarlane J; Staley J; Waters G
    Cognition; 2008 Oct; 109(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 18834975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sign Perception and Recognition in Non-Native Signers of ASL.
    Morford JP; Carlson ML
    Lang Learn Dev; 2011 Jan; 7(2):149-168. PubMed ID: 21686080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The sign superiority effect: Lexical status facilitates peripheral handshape identification for deaf signers.
    Schotter ER; Johnson E; Lieberman AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1397-1410. PubMed ID: 32940493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers.
    Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):170-81. PubMed ID: 12027401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Gesture and Linguistic Experience on Sign Perception.
    Gimeno-Martínez M; Costa A; Baus C
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2020 Jan; 25(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 31504619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of sign language experience on categorical perception of dynamic ASL pseudosigns.
    Best CT; Mathur G; Miranda KA; Lillo-Martin D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):747-62. PubMed ID: 20348580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. American Sign Language Comprehension Test: A Tool for Sign Language Researchers.
    Hauser PC; Paludneviciene R; Riddle W; Kurz KB; Emmorey K; Contreras J
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2016 Jan; 21(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 26590608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced facial discrimination: effects of experience with American sign language.
    Bettger J; Emmorey K; McCullough S; Bellugi U
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 1997; 2(4):223-33. PubMed ID: 15579850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences in the use of American Sign Language morphology by deaf children: implications for parents and teachers.
    Galvan D
    Am Ann Deaf; 1999 Oct; 144(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 10561870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Signed language working memory capacity of signed language interpreters and deaf signers.
    Wang J; Napier J
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2013 Apr; 18(2):271-86. PubMed ID: 23303377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ASL Phonological Fluency: How Do Deaf Signers Retrieve and Produce Signs?
    Beal JS; Bowman S
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2023 Mar; 28(2):178-188. PubMed ID: 36526438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Watching language grow in the manual modality: nominals, predicates, and handshapes.
    Goldin-Meadow S; Brentari D; Coppola M; Horton L; Senghas A
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():381-95. PubMed ID: 25546342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neuroanatomical profiles of deafness in the context of native language experience.
    Olulade OA; Koo DS; LaSasso CJ; Eden GF
    J Neurosci; 2014 Apr; 34(16):5613-20. PubMed ID: 24741051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensorimotor system engagement during ASL sign perception: An EEG study in deaf signers and hearing non-signers.
    Kubicek E; Quandt LC
    Cortex; 2019 Oct; 119():457-469. PubMed ID: 31505437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Second language acquisition of American Sign Language influences co-speech gesture production.
    Weisberg J; Casey S; Sehyr ZS; Emmorey K
    Biling (Camb Engl); 2020 May; 23(3):473-482. PubMed ID: 32733161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of language deprivation in early childhood on L2 processing: An ERP comparison of deaf native signers and deaf signers with a delayed language acquisition.
    Skotara N; Salden U; Kügow M; Hänel-Faulhaber B; Röder B
    BMC Neurosci; 2012 May; 13():44. PubMed ID: 22554360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Eye Tracking Study on the Perception and Comprehension of Unimodal and Bimodal Linguistic Inputs by Deaf Adolescents.
    Mastrantuono E; Saldaña D; Rodríguez-Ortiz IR
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1044. PubMed ID: 28680416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Handshape monitoring: Evaluation of linguistic and perceptual factors in the processing of American Sign Language.
    Grosvald M; Lachaud C; Corina D
    Lang Cogn Process; 2012 Jan; 27(1):117-141. PubMed ID: 22822282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of spatial attention on motion processing in deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners.
    Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):152-69. PubMed ID: 12027400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners' gestures without speech.
    Schembri A; Jones C; Burnham D
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(3):272-90. PubMed ID: 15858072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.