582 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18835390)
1. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection.
Sawhney MS; Cury MS; Neeman N; Ngo LH; Lewis JM; Chuttani R; Pleskow DK; Aronson MD
Gastroenterology; 2008 Dec; 135(6):1892-8. PubMed ID: 18835390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.
Simmons DT; Harewood GC; Baron TH; Petersen BT; Wang KK; Boyd-Enders F; Ott BJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Sep; 24(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 16948808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Impact assessment of increasing the time of withdrawal of colonoscopy in the detection rate of polyps in our midst].
Velásquez J; Espinoza-Ríos J; Huerta-Mercado J; Pinto J; De los Ríos R; Piscoya A; OR C; Zegarra A; Bussalleu A
Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2009; 29(4):321-5. PubMed ID: 20066016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Withdrawal times and associated factors in colonoscopy: a quality assurance multicenter assessment.
Overholt BF; Brooks-Belli L; Grace M; Rankin K; Harrell R; Turyk M; Rosenberg FB; Barish RW; Gilinsky NH;
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Apr; 44(4):e80-6. PubMed ID: 19881361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of periodic monitoring and feedback on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores.
Lin OS; Kozarek RA; Arai A; Gluck M; Jiranek GC; Kowdley KV; McCormick SE; Schembre DB; Soon MS; Dominitz JA
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jun; 71(7):1253-9. PubMed ID: 20598251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy.
Sanchez W; Harewood GC; Petersen BT
Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Oct; 99(10):1941-5. PubMed ID: 15447753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Doughty AS; Johanson JF; Greenlaw RL
N Engl J Med; 2006 Dec; 355(24):2533-41. PubMed ID: 17167136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of 6-minute colonoscopy withdrawal time policy on polyp detection rate in a community hospital.
Baker SL; Miller RA; Creighton A; Aguilar PS
Gastroenterol Nurs; 2015; 38(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 25831245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.
Barclay RL; Vicari JJ; Greenlaw RL
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Oct; 6(10):1091-8. PubMed ID: 18639495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The polyp detection rate of colonoscopy: a national study of Medicare beneficiaries.
Cooper GS; Chak A; Koroukian S
Am J Med; 2005 Dec; 118(12):1413. PubMed ID: 16378787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trainee participation is associated with increased small adenoma detection.
Buchner AM; Shahid MW; Heckman MG; Diehl NN; McNeil RB; Cleveland P; Gill KR; Schore A; Ghabril M; Raimondo M; Gross SA; Wallace MB
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Jun; 73(6):1223-31. PubMed ID: 21481861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variable detection of nonadenomatous polyps by individual endoscopists at colonoscopy and correlation with adenoma detection.
Chen SC; Rex DK
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Jul; 42(6):704-7. PubMed ID: 18496392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies.
Heresbach D; Barrioz T; Lapalus MG; Coumaros D; Bauret P; Potier P; Sautereau D; Boustière C; Grimaud JC; Barthélémy C; Sée J; Serraj I; D'Halluin PN; Branger B; Ponchon T
Endoscopy; 2008 Apr; 40(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 18389446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Withdrawal time as a quality indicator for colonoscopy - a nationwide analysis.
Moritz V; Bretthauer M; Ruud HK; Glomsaker T; de Lange T; Sandvei P; Huppertz-Hauss G; Kjellevold Ø; Hoff G
Endoscopy; 2012 May; 44(5):476-81. PubMed ID: 22531983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving compliance with postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: an interventional study using a continuous quality improvement initiative.
Sanaka MR; Super DM; Feldman ES; Mullen KD; Ferguson DR; McCullough AJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2006 Jan; 63(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 16377324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.
East JE; Stavrindis M; Thomas-Gibson S; Guenther T; Tekkis PP; Saunders BP
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Sep; 28(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 18715401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.
Kahi CJ; Hewett DG; Norton DL; Eckert GJ; Rex DK
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jan; 9(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 20888435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Role of the endoscopist in the detection of adenomatous polyps during colonoscopy].
Parra V; Watanabe J; Nago A; Astete M; Rodríguez C; Valladares G; Nuñez N; Yoza M; Gargurevich T; Pinto Sánchez J
Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2009; 29(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 20066017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Quality indicators for colonoscopy: differences in polyp detection between endoscopists at one hospital].
van Lelyveld N; van Oijen MG; Schwartz MP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(24):A4219. PubMed ID: 22742441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
