BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

39 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18836595)

  • 1. Using suture anchors for cervical laminoplasty: a reliable, safe, and simple technique.
    Khan SN; Edmonds EW; Titelman RM; Gupta MC
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 Aug; 37(8):400-2. PubMed ID: 18836595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lateral mass anchoring screws for cervical laminoplasty: preliminary report of a novel technique.
    Chen HC; Chang MC; Yu WK; Wang ST; Liu CL; Chen TH
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):387-92. PubMed ID: 18679091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double-door cervical laminoplasty with the use of suture anchors: technical note.
    Miyata M; Neo M; Fujibayashi S; Takemoto M; Nakamura T
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Dec; 21(8):575-8. PubMed ID: 19057251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of small suture anchors in cervical laminoplasty to maintain canal expansion: a technical note.
    Lee JY; Hanks SE; Oxner W; Tannoury C; Donaldson WF; Kang JD
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 17285049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Open-door expansile cervical laminoplasty.
    Vitarbo E; Sheth RN; Levi AD
    Neurosurgery; 2007 Jan; 60(1 Supp1 1):S154-9. PubMed ID: 17204878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Efficacy of double-door laminoplasty combined with hydroxyapatite artificial bone grafting for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy].
    Lü Q; Zhuang YF; Chen XM; Wang WM
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2004 Aug; 24(8):958-9. PubMed ID: 15321775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laminoplasty using Twinfix suture anchors to maintain cervical canal expansion.
    Yu HL; Xiang LB; Liu J; Chen Y; Yu M; Cao Y
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Oct; 19(10):1795-8. PubMed ID: 20449612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Open-door laminoplasty with suture anchor fixation for cervical myelopathy in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.
    Yang SC; Yu SW; Tu YK; Niu CC; Chen LH; Chen WJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Oct; 20(7):492-8. PubMed ID: 17912125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of the suture anchors used in open-door laminoplasty: a cadaveric study.
    Kurokawa Y; Yokoyama Y; Kuroda K; Koruprolu S; Paller D; Nakano A; Baba I; Neo M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(21):E1248-55. PubMed ID: 25054651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Results of skip laminectomy-minimum 2-year follow-up study compared with open-door laminoplasty.
    Shiraishi T; Fukuda K; Yato Y; Nakamura M; Ikegami T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Dec; 28(24):2667-72. PubMed ID: 14673367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Instrumented open-door laminoplasty as treatment for cervical myelopathy in 104 patients.
    Dimar JR; Bratcher KR; Brock DC; Glassman SD; Campbell MJ; Carreon LY
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2009 Jul; 38(7):E123-8. PubMed ID: 19714281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Suda K; Abumi K; Ito M; Shono Y; Kaneda K; Fujiya M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(12):1258-62. PubMed ID: 12811268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy--average 14-year follow-up study.
    Chiba K; Ogawa Y; Ishii K; Takaishi H; Nakamura M; Maruiwa H; Matsumoto M; Toyama Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):2998-3005. PubMed ID: 17172996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The comparative study of effect of a modified open door laminoplasty using anchor method on axial symptoms and cervical curvature].
    Zhang XL; Wang SJ; Wang YL; Liu XQ
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2008 Oct; 21(10):759-61. PubMed ID: 19105372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Double-door cervical laminoplasty with suture anchors: evaluation of the clinical performance of the constructs.
    Fujishiro T; Nakano A; Baba I; Fukumoto S; Nakaya Y; Neo M
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1121-1128. PubMed ID: 27329617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty.
    Masaki Y; Yamazaki M; Okawa A; Aramomi M; Hashimoto M; Koda M; Mochizuki M; Moriya H
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 17285045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expansive laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with interconnected porous calcium hydroxyapatite ceramic spacers: comparison with autogenous bone spacers.
    Tanaka N; Nakanishi K; Fujimoto Y; Sasaki H; Kamei N; Hamasaki T; Yamada K; Yamamoto R; Nakamae T; Ochi M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Dec; 21(8):547-52. PubMed ID: 19057246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [One-stage operative treatment of atlanto-axial instability with stenosis of lower cervical level of spinal canal].
    Liu H; Yang Z; Chen T
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1998 Sep; 12(5):269-71. PubMed ID: 10437101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preservation of the spinous process-ligament-muscle complex to prevent kyphotic deformity following laminoplasty.
    Liu J; Ebraheim NA; Sanford CG; Patil V; Haman SP; Ren L; Yang H
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 17321964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adjacent segment disease following expansive lumbar laminoplasty.
    Kawaguchi Y; Ishihara H; Kanamori M; Yasuda T; Abe Y; Nogami S; Seki S; Hori T; Kimura T
    Spine J; 2007; 7(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 17482109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.