247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18837184)
1. [Obtaining medical ethical approval for a multicentre, randomised study: prospective evaluation of a ponderous process].
van Santvoort HC; Besselink MG; Gooszen HG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2077-83. PubMed ID: 18837184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Obtaining medical ethical approval for a multicentre, randomised study: prospective evaluation of a ponderous process].
Bosch FH; Klazinga NS; Schaffmeister BE
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009 Feb; 153(7):310; author reply 310. PubMed ID: 19291950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Obtaining medical ethical approval for a multicentre, randomised study: prospective evaluation of a ponderous process].
Bosch FH; Klazinga NS; Schaffmeister BE
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009 Jan; 153(4):154. PubMed ID: 19348140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Unnecessary delays in ethical approval of multicentre clinical trials].
Evers JL
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2062-4. PubMed ID: 18837181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the ethical review process for non-pharmacological multicentre studies in Germany on the basis of a randomised surgical trial.
Seiler CM; Kellmeyer P; Kienle P; Büchler MW; Knaebel HP;
J Med Ethics; 2007 Feb; 33(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 17264200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trust and confidence: towards mutual acceptance of ethics committee approval of multicentre studies.
Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Mok MT; Dodds M; Rosenthal MA
Intern Med J; 2004 Nov; 34(11):598-603. PubMed ID: 15546452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adverse effects of a multicentre system for ethics approval on the progress of a prospective multicentre trial of cancer treatment: how many patients die waiting?
Christie DR; Gabriel GS; Dear K
Intern Med J; 2007 Oct; 37(10):680-6. PubMed ID: 17894765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A nationwide Dutch study into the optimal treatment of patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis: the PANTER trial].
van Santvoort HC; Besselink MG; Cirkel GA; Gooszen HG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 Aug; 150(33):1844-6. PubMed ID: 16967597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [New procedure for review of multicentre studies: procedure improved, implementation variable].
Schepers NJ; Besselink MG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2014; 158():A7328. PubMed ID: 24800801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical dilemmas of a large national multi-centre study in Australia: time for some consistency.
Driscoll A; Currey J; Worrall-Carter L; Stewart S
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2212-20. PubMed ID: 18705740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The difficulties and costs of ethical assessment of a national research project.
Dockerty JD; Elwood M
N Z Med J; 1992 Aug; 105(939):311-3. PubMed ID: 1501815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of recent legislative bills regarding clinical research on Italian ethics committee activity.
Porcu L; Poli D; Torri V; Rulli E; Di Tullio MC; Cinquini M; Bajetta E; Labianca R; Di Costanzo F; Nitti D; Floriani I
J Med Ethics; 2008 Oct; 34(10):747-50. PubMed ID: 18827108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The new system of review by multicentre research ethics committees: prospective study.
Tully J; Ninis N; Booy R; Viner R
BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1179-82. PubMed ID: 10784541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical issues: the multi-centre low-risk ethics/governance review process and AMOSS.
Vaughan G; Pollock W; Peek MJ; Knight M; Ellwood D; Homer CS; Pulver LJ; McLintock C; Ho MT; Sullivan EA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 52(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 22188386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicentre trials review process by research ethics committees in Spain: where do they stand before implementing the new European regulation?
Dal-Ré R; Ortega R; Morejón E
J Med Ethics; 2005 Jun; 31(6):344-50. PubMed ID: 15923484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Ethics of medical scientific research: informed consent and the therapeutic misconception].
de Vries MC; van Leeuwen E
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Mar; 152(12):679-83. PubMed ID: 18438063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Quality of a non-subsidised multicentre randomised trial in non-academic hospitals; an audit].
Aufenacker TJ; Bannenberg J; van Geldere D; Scheijde E; Juttmann JW; Gouma DJ; Simons MP
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 Jun; 150(24):1337-41. PubMed ID: 16808365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics committee reviews and mutual acceptance: a pilot study.
Rosenthal MA; Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Arkell K; Dodds M;
Intern Med J; 2005 Nov; 35(11):650-4. PubMed ID: 16248858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reporting of ethical review of clinical research submitted to the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.
Perkins AC; Choi JM; Kimball AB
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2007 Feb; 56(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 17224370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Governance approval for multisite, non-interventional research: what can Harmonisation of Multi-Centre Ethical Review learn from the New South Wales experience?
Vajdic CM; Meagher NS; Hicks SC; Faedo M; Ward RL; Pearson SA
Intern Med J; 2012 Feb; 42(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 21241439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
