988 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18839610)
1. [Complications of surgical treatment of mandibular prognathism].
Gaszyńska E; Kozakiewicz M
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2008 Jul; 25(145):27-31. PubMed ID: 18839610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Evaluation of soft tissue changes after mandibular prognathism surgery].
Gaszyńska E; Kozakiewicz M
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2009 Dec; 27(162):474-7. PubMed ID: 20120710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transient facial nerve palsy following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for setback of the mandible: a review of incidence and management.
Rai KK; Shivakumar HR; Sonar MD
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Feb; 66(2):373-8. PubMed ID: 18201627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Plate fixation of extra-oral subcondylar ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: clinical aspects and short term stability.
Høgevold HE; Mobarak KA; Espeland L; Krogstad O; Skjelbred P
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 29(4):205-11; discussion 212-3. PubMed ID: 11562089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of postoperative hypoesthesia between two types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy, using the trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential method.
Takazakura D; Ueki K; Nakagawa K; Marukawa K; Shimada M; Shamiul A; Yamamoto E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 36(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 17141470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Facial nerve palsy after sagittal split ramus osteotomy of the mandible: mechanism and outcomes.
Choi BK; Goh RC; Chen PK; Chuang DC; Lo LJ; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1615-21. PubMed ID: 20434255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing the effect of 3 orthognathic surgical methods on the mandibular range of movement.
Yazdani J; Ebrahimi H; Talesh KT; Khashabi E; Pourshahidi S; Tadbir AA
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 May; 21(3):703-5. PubMed ID: 20485032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship between recovery period of lower lip hypoesthesia and sagittal split area or plate screw position after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Hashiba Y; Ueki K; Marukawa K; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E; Matsubara K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jan; 105(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17764990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.
Chou JI; Fong HJ; Kuang SH; Gi LY; Hwang FY; Lai YC; Chang RC; Kao SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extraoral vertical subcondylar osteotomy with rigid fixation for correction of mandibular prognathism. Comparison with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and surgical technique.
Hågensli N; Stenvik A; Espeland L
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 23102564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation and refinement of the intraoral vertical subcondylar osteotomy.
Hall HD; Chase DC; Payor LG
J Oral Surg; 1975 May; 33(5):333-41. PubMed ID: 1055188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors affecting neurosensory disturbance after mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
Ylikontiola L; Kinnunen J; Oikarinen K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Nov; 58(11):1234-9; discussion 1239-40. PubMed ID: 11078134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of material-related complications after bilateral sagittal split mandibular setback surgery: biodegradable versus titanium miniplates.
Yoshioka I; Igawa K; Nagata J; Yoshida M; Ogawa Y; Ichiki T; Yokota R; Takamori K; Kashima K; Sakoda S
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):919-24. PubMed ID: 21757275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of masticatory function after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for patients with mandibular prognathism.
Kikuta T; Hara I; Seto T; Yoshioka I; Nakashima T; Yasumitsu C
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 8006486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of intraoral verticosagittal ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism: a 10-year study.
Hashemi HM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 66(3):509-12. PubMed ID: 18280385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complications of sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus.
Behrman SJ
J Oral Surg; 1972 Aug; 30(8):554-61. PubMed ID: 4537684
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Revisiting the supraforaminal horizontal oblique osteotomy of the mandible.
Kaduk WM; Podmelle F; Louis PJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):421-8. PubMed ID: 21684657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Contrast analysis of different sagittal split ramus osteotomy methods in correcting mandibular prognathism].
Teng L; Ren M; Zhang Z
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jul; 20(7):709-12. PubMed ID: 16892802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical morbidities of sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: a randomized clinical trial.
Leung YY; Wang R; Wong NSM; Li DTS; Au SW; Choi WS; Su YX
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 50(7):933-939. PubMed ID: 33168369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
