These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18840152)

  • 1. Assessing the effects of bias on the magnitude of outcomes in clinical studies: lessons for the research community?
    Hughes FJ
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Sep; 35(9):773-4. PubMed ID: 18840152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of bias on the magnitude of clinical outcomes in periodontology: a pilot study.
    Fenwick J; Needleman IG; Moles DR
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Sep; 35(9):775-82. PubMed ID: 18840153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical trial designs and clinical practice: are they compatible?
    Punt CJ
    Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):518-9. PubMed ID: 14709922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Review of randomized controlled trials: issues to consider when designing a trial.
    Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):905-7. PubMed ID: 23726342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical principles: myths or facts?
    Sylvester R
    Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):520-1. PubMed ID: 14709923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical trials methodology: randomization, intent-to-treat, and random-effects regression.
    Atkins DC
    Depress Anxiety; 2009; 26(8):697-700. PubMed ID: 19658122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential pitfalls of interim analysis.
    Siddiqui F; Shan WL; Schricker T; Backman SB
    Can J Anaesth; 2006 Aug; 53(8):848-9; discussion 849-50. PubMed ID: 16873356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical trial design for orthodontists.
    Pandis N; Cobourne MT
    J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 40(2):93-103. PubMed ID: 23794689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sympathetic bias.
    Levy DM; Peart SJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Jun; 17(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 17925315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making inferences on treatment effects from real world data: propensity scores, confounding by indication, and other perils for the unwary in observational research.
    Freemantle N; Marston L; Walters K; Wood J; Reynolds MR; Petersen I
    BMJ; 2013 Nov; 347():f6409. PubMed ID: 24217206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stopping trials for efficacy: an almost unbiased view.
    Goodman SN
    Clin Trials; 2009 Apr; 6(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 19342465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inconsistent treatment estimates from mis-specified logistic regression analyses of randomized trials.
    Matthews JN; Badi NH
    Stat Med; 2015 Aug; 34(19):2681-94. PubMed ID: 25869059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized clinical trial: myths around elementary statistical principles.
    Edler L; Kopp-Schneider A
    Onkologie; 2003 Dec; 26(6):551-6. PubMed ID: 14709929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Messages for Clinicians: Moderators and Mediators of Treatment Outcome in Randomized Clinical Trials.
    Kraemer HC
    Am J Psychiatry; 2016 Jul; 173(7):672-9. PubMed ID: 26988629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Randomized trials or population-based registries.
    Bergqvist D; Björck M; Säwe J; Troëng T
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Sep; 34(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 17689818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical efficiency in multiple-to-one comparison trials with optimal allocation ratio.
    Zhang J; Zhang JJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Jan; 21(1):125-35. PubMed ID: 21191859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-dose mannitol.
    Zygun D
    J Neurosurg; 2004 Sep; 101(3):567; author reply 568. PubMed ID: 15352624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Clinical trials: methodological requirements and interpretation].
    Windeler J; Lange S
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2009 Apr; 52(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 19322527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is Propensity Score Analysis a Valid Surrogate of Randomization for the Avoidance of Allocation Bias?
    Torres F; Ríos J; Saez-Peñataro J; Pontes C
    Semin Liver Dis; 2017 Aug; 37(3):275-286. PubMed ID: 28847037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical trial registries are of minimal use for identifying selective outcome and analysis reporting.
    Norris SL; Holmer HK; Fu R; Ogden LA; Viswanathan MS; Abou-Setta AM
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 26052852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.