These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18840152)
41. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials. Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Missing data in randomized controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis with radiographic outcomes: a simulation study. Baron G; Ravaud P; Samson A; Giraudeau B Arthritis Rheum; 2008 Jan; 59(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 18163406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Ethics of randomised controlled trials--not yet time to give up on equipoise. Ashcroft RE Arthritis Res Ther; 2004; 6(6):237-9. PubMed ID: 15535836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Planning a clinical trial. Brown WV; Bays HE; Maki KC; Wild RA J Clin Lipidol; 2012; 6(6):484-95. PubMed ID: 23312046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Neonatal trials need thousands, not hundreds, to change global practice. Tarnow-Mordi W; Kumar P; Kler N Acta Paediatr; 2011 Mar; 100(3):330-3. PubMed ID: 21281339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Standardized mean differences in individually-randomized and cluster-randomized trials, with applications to meta-analysis. White IR; Thomas J Clin Trials; 2005; 2(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 16279136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Publication bias and the efficacy of antidepressants. Mathew SJ; Charney DS Am J Psychiatry; 2009 Feb; 166(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 19188290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Meta-research matters: Meta-spin cycles, the blindness of bias, and rebuilding trust. Bero L PLoS Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(4):e2005972. PubMed ID: 29608562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions. Shadish WR; Cook TD Annu Rev Psychol; 2009; 60():607-29. PubMed ID: 18616391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Intent-to-treat analysis in the presence of off-treatment or missing data. Keene ON Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 20198606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The principle of parallelism in the design of studies to estimate treatment effects. Reichardt CS Psychol Methods; 2006 Mar; 11(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 16594764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Methods for the analysis of binary outcome results in the presence of missing data. Delucchi KL J Consult Clin Psychol; 1994 Jun; 62(3):569-75. PubMed ID: 8063983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Cluster-randomized controlled trials: Part 2. Pandis N Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Sep; 142(3):422-3. PubMed ID: 22920711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Bias and trials stopped early for benefit. Ellenberg SS; DeMets DL; Fleming TR JAMA; 2010 Jul; 304(2):158; author reply 158-9. PubMed ID: 20628127 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]