These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18840858)

  • 1. The collapse of capitalism, values - and peer review?
    Abbasi K
    J R Soc Med; 2008 Oct; 101(10):479. PubMed ID: 18840858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transparency in Peer Review.
    Can J Diet Pract Res; 2017 Dec; 78(4):165. PubMed ID: 29143544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Journal peer reviewing. Anonymity or disclosure?
    DeBakey L
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1990 Mar; 108(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 2310331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Code of conduct"--a matter of principle.
    Marquardt HW
    Toxicology; 2001 Jan; 156(2-3):171. PubMed ID: 11164619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review at a crossroads--a case study.
    Dost FN
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Sep; 15(6):443-7. PubMed ID: 18704531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Good review.
    Nat Cell Biol; 2008 Apr; 10(4):371. PubMed ID: 18379593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Journal impact factors and research submission pressures.
    Makeham JM; Pilowsky PM
    ANZ J Surg; 2003 Mar; 73(3):93-4. PubMed ID: 12608963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review.
    Felton G; Swanson EA
    J Prof Nurs; 1995; 11(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 7844277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Editorial conflict of interest: art or science? The hippocratic solution.
    Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jan; 27(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 11805626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publish or perish. The debate from a global perspective.
    Jones R
    Aust Fam Physician; 1999 May; 28(5):425-6. PubMed ID: 10376362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Peer review: an essential step in the publishing process.
    Weil J
    J Genet Couns; 2004 Jun; 13(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 15617209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of social relevance of applied health research: a rough indicator may be the significance of publishing in national professional journals].
    Bouter LM; Knottnerus JA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(24):1178-83. PubMed ID: 10876699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Closed loop peer review.
    Hill M
    EMBO Rep; 2019 Jan; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 30518624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. "Outing" peer review: medical editors scrutinize the value of secrecy.
    Vanchieri C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Nov; 89(21):1568-9. PubMed ID: 9362150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review--a study of reliability.
    Ceci SJ; Peters DP
    Change; 1982 Sep; 14(6):44-8. PubMed ID: 10259866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rigorous Peer Review is Worth the Effort.
    Kearney MH
    Res Nurs Health; 2016 Dec; 39(6):393-395. PubMed ID: 27740694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhancements in peer review of manuscripts by the Journal.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 158(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 24929824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer Review of Scholarly Work.
    Brandon D; McGrath JM
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2018 Dec; 18(6):423-424. PubMed ID: 30499821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peer review: A critical cog in the scholarship wheel.
    Zavod RM
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2018; 10(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 29248064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation.
    Horrobin DF
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1438-41. PubMed ID: 2304222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.