These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18841850)

  • 1. Volumetric breast density evaluation from ultrasound tomography images.
    Glide-Hurst CK; Duric N; Littrup P
    Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):3988-97. PubMed ID: 18841850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density.
    Glide-Hurst CK; Duric N; Littrup P
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4491-8. PubMed ID: 18072514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel approach to evaluating breast density utilizing ultrasound tomography.
    Glide C; Duric N; Littrup P
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):744-53. PubMed ID: 17388192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast density measurements with ultrasound tomography: a comparison with film and digital mammography.
    Duric N; Boyd N; Littrup P; Sak M; Myc L; Li C; West E; Minkin S; Martin L; Yaffe M; Schmidt S; Faiz M; Shen J; Melnichouk O; Li Q; Albrecht T
    Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):013501. PubMed ID: 23298122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
    Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories.
    Singh T; Sharma M; Singla V; Khandelwal N
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated mammographic breast density estimation using a fully convolutional network.
    Lee J; Nishikawa RM
    Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1178-1190. PubMed ID: 29363774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative assessment of breast density using transmission ultrasound tomography.
    Wiskin J; Malik B; Natesan R; Lenox M
    Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 46(6):2610-2620. PubMed ID: 30893476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment.
    Gweon HM; Youk JH; Kim JA; Son EJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 23971465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of a fully automated, high-throughput mammographic density measurement tool for use with processed digital mammograms.
    Couwenberg AM; Verkooijen HM; Li J; Pijnappel RM; Charaghvandi KR; Hartman M; van Gils CH
    Cancer Causes Control; 2014 Aug; 25(8):1037-43. PubMed ID: 24962023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective.
    Mohamed AA; Luo Y; Peng H; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 28932980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Kim JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
    Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
    Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Speed of Sound Imaging to Characterize Breast Density.
    Sak M; Duric N; Littrup P; Bey-Knight L; Ali H; Vallieres P; Sherman ME; Gierach GL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 43(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 27692872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
    Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging.
    Lee NA; Rusinek H; Weinreb J; Chandra R; Toth H; Singer C; Newstead G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):501-6. PubMed ID: 9016235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo breast sound-speed imaging with ultrasound tomography.
    Li C; Duric N; Littrup P; Huang L
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1615-28. PubMed ID: 19647920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increased mammographic breast density in acromegaly: quantitative and qualitative assessment.
    Tagliafico A; Calabrese M; Tagliafico G; Resmini E; Martinoli C; Rebora A; Colao A; Pivonello R; Ferone D
    Eur J Endocrinol; 2011 Mar; 164(3):335-40. PubMed ID: 21156646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions.
    Nicholson BT; LoRusso AP; Smolkin M; Bovbjerg VE; Petroni GR; Harvey JA
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 16935726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Automated Volumetric Software and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Categorization by Expert Radiologists.
    Damases CN; Brennan PC; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 26514436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.