These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18841850)

  • 21. Association and Prediction Utilizing Craniocaudal and Mediolateral Oblique View Digital Mammography and Long-Term Breast Cancer Risk.
    Chen S; Tamimi RM; Colditz GA; Jiang S
    Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2023 Sep; 16(9):531-537. PubMed ID: 37428020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predicting breast cancer risk using mammographic density measurements from both mammogram sides and views.
    Stone J; Ding J; Warren RM; Duffy SW
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Nov; 124(2):551-4. PubMed ID: 20544272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Whole Breast Sound Speed Measurement from US Tomography Correlates Strongly with Volumetric Breast Density from Mammography.
    Sak M; Littrup P; Brem R; Duric N
    J Breast Imaging; 2020; 2(5):443-451. PubMed ID: 33015618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Breast density analysis for whole breast ultrasound images.
    Chen JH; Huang CS; Chien KC; Takada E; Moon WK; Wu JH; Cho N; Wang YF; Chang RF
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4933-43. PubMed ID: 19994502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
    He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Semiautomatic estimation of breast density with DM-Scan software.
    Martínez Gómez I; Casals El Busto M; Antón Guirao J; Ruiz Perales F; Llobet Azpitarte R
    Radiologia; 2014; 56(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 23489767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breast fat volume measurement using wide-bore 3 T MRI: comparison of traditional mammographic density evaluation with MRI density measurements using automatic segmentation.
    Petridou E; Kibiro M; Gladwell C; Malcolm P; Toms A; Juette A; Borga M; Dahlqvist Leinhard O; Romu T; Kasmai B; Denton E
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Jul; 72(7):565-572. PubMed ID: 28363661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality.
    O'Connell A; Conover DL; Zhang Y; Seifert P; Logan-Young W; Lin CF; Sahler L; Ning R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):496-509. PubMed ID: 20651210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical comparison of a novel breast DXA technique to mammographic density.
    Shepherd JA; Herve L; Landau J; Fan B; Kerlikowske K; Cummings SR
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1490-8. PubMed ID: 16752583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer.
    Ziv E; Tice J; Smith-Bindman R; Shepherd J; Cummings S; Kerlikowske K
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Dec; 13(12):2090-5. PubMed ID: 15598766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk.
    Kerlikowske K; Ichikawa L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Vacek PM; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas B; Carney PA; Ballard-Barbash R;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):386-95. PubMed ID: 17341730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sound-speed image reconstruction in sparse-aperture 3-D ultrasound transmission tomography.
    Jirík R; Peterlík I; Ruiter N; Fousek J; Dapp R; Zapf M; Jan J
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Feb; 59(2):254-64. PubMed ID: 24626033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ultrasound Tomography Evaluation of Breast Density: A Comparison With Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    OʼFlynn EAM; Fromageau J; Ledger AE; Messa A; DʼAquino A; Schoemaker MJ; Schmidt M; Duric N; Swerdlow AJ; Bamber JC
    Invest Radiol; 2017 Jun; 52(6):343-348. PubMed ID: 28121639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of Training on Qualitative Mammographic Density Assessment.
    Raza S; Mackesy MM; Winkler NS; Hurwitz S; Birdwell RL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Mar; 13(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 26944039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Low frequency 3D transmission ultrasound tomography: technical details and clinical implications.
    Wiskin J; Malik B; Klock J
    Z Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 33(3):427-443. PubMed ID: 37295982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
    Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
    Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Breast thickness in routine mammograms: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Helvie MA; Chan HP; Adler DD; Boyd PG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1371-4. PubMed ID: 7992731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Variability of breast density assessment in short-term reimaging with digital mammography.
    Kim WH; Moon WK; Kim SM; Yi A; Chang JM; Koo HR; Lee SH; Cho N
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1724-30. PubMed ID: 23727379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Single x-ray absorptiometry method for the quantitative mammographic measure of fibroglandular tissue volume.
    Malkov S; Wang J; Kerlikowske K; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5525-36. PubMed ID: 20095265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.