These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Three cheers for peers. Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The real dirty secret of academic publishing. Svetlov V Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):897. PubMed ID: 15496892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Plagiarism: an unprofessional and dishonest trend creeping into modern writing of research and review papers. Stephens MM Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 15(2):57. PubMed ID: 19410168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Why are people reluctant to join in open review? Liu SV Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1052. PubMed ID: 17597736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Researchers may be part of the problem in predatory publishing. Vogel L CMAJ; 2017 Oct; 189(42):E1324-E1325. PubMed ID: 29061862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Predatory Journals: A Potential Threat to Nursing Practice and Science. Bourgault AM Crit Care Nurse; 2019 Aug; 39(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 31371362 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Who really wrote your paper? Johnson M Nurse Educ Today; 2006 Jan; 26(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 16338483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. How do impact factors relate to the real world? Skórka P Nature; 2003 Oct; 425(6959):661. PubMed ID: 14562076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Standards for papers on cloning. Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):243. PubMed ID: 16421524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Pre-peer review, peer review, and post-peer review: three areas with potential for improvement. Stang A; Poole C; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):309-10. PubMed ID: 18313552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]