BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

624 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18844700)

  • 1. Trends of contact allergy to fragrance mix I and Myroxylon pereirae among Danish eczema patients tested between 1985 and 2007.
    Thyssen JP; Carlsen BC; Menné T; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Oct; 59(4):238-44. PubMed ID: 18844700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frequency of and trends in fragrance allergy over a 15-year period.
    Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Ottoy W; Drieghe J; Goossens A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 18279150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Association between positive patch tests to epoxy resin and fragrance mix I ingredients.
    Andersen KE; Christensen LP; Vølund A; Johansen JD; Paulsen E
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Mar; 60(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 19260913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The prevalence and morbidity of sensitization to fragrance mix I in the general population.
    Thyssen JP; Linneberg A; Menné T; Nielsen NH; Johansen JD
    Br J Dermatol; 2009 Jul; 161(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 19438476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Immediate contact reactions to fragrance mix constituents and Myroxylon pereirae resin.
    Tanaka S; Matsumoto Y; Dlova N; Ostlere LS; Goldsmith PC; Rycroft RJ; Basketter DA; White IR; Banerjee P; McFadden JP
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 15291827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fragrance contact allergy: a 4-year retrospective study.
    Cuesta L; Silvestre JF; Toledo F; Lucas A; Pérez-Crespo M; Ballester I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Aug; 63(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 20573166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contact allergy to farnesol in 2021 consecutively patch tested patients. Results of the IVDK.
    Schnuch A; Uter W; Geier J; Lessmann H; Frosch PJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Mar; 50(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 15153123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Contact allergy to fragrances].
    Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
    Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A clinical and patch test study of patients with positive patch test reactions to fragrance mix in China.
    Lu X; Li LF; Wang W; Wang J
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):188-91. PubMed ID: 15859990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A link between skin and airways regarding sensitivity to fragrance products?
    Elberling J; Linneberg A; Mosbech H; Dirksen A; Frølund L; Madsen F; Nielsen NH; Johansen JD
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Dec; 151(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 15606515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of patch testing with fragrance mix 1, fragrance mix 2, and their ingredients, and Myroxylon pereirae and colophonium, over a 21-year period.
    Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Drieghe J; Goossens A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2013 May; 68(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 23601065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A review of 241 subjects who were patch tested twice: could fragrance mix I cause active sensitization?
    White JM; McFadden JP; White IR
    Br J Dermatol; 2008 Mar; 158(3):518-21. PubMed ID: 18205877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strong allergic patch test reactions may indicate a general disposition for contact allergy.
    Brasch J; Schnuch A; Uter W;
    Allergy; 2006 Mar; 61(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 16436147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fragrance mix II in the baseline series contributes significantly to detection of fragrance allergy.
    Heisterberg MV; Andersen KE; Avnstorp C; Kristensen B; Kristensen O; Kaaber K; Laurberg G; Menné T; Nielsen NH; Sommerlund M; Thormann J; Veien NK; Vissing S; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Nov; 63(5):270-6. PubMed ID: 20946455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patch testing with fine fragrances: comparison with fragrance mix, balsam of Peru and a fragrance series.
    Trattner A; David M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Dec; 49(6):287-9. PubMed ID: 15025700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identification of risk products for fragrance contact allergy: a case-referent study based on patients' histories.
    Johansen JD; Andersen TF; Kjøller M; Veien N; Avnstorp C; Andersen KE; Menné T
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Jun; 9(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 9601907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contact allergy to allergens of the TRUE-test (panels 1 and 2) has decreased modestly in the general population.
    Thyssen JP; Linneberg A; Menné T; Nielsen NH; Johansen JD
    Br J Dermatol; 2009 Nov; 161(5):1124-9. PubMed ID: 19857210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unexpected sensitization routes and general frequency of contact allergies in an elderly stented Swedish population.
    Svedman C; Ekqvist S; Möller H; Björk J; Gruvberger B; Holmström E; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Jun; 56(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 17577375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitization to contact allergens and bronchial hyper-responsiveness.
    Schnabel E; Schoefer Y; Chen CM; Schäfer T; Behrendt H; Ring J; Wichmann HE; Heinrich J;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Sep; 63(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 20690939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity to Myroxylon pereirae resin (balsam of Peru). A study of 50 cases.
    Avalos-Peralta P; García-Bravo B; Camacho FM
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):304-6. PubMed ID: 15932578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.