These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18844862)
1. Methods for assessing uncertainty in fundamental assumptions and associated models for cancer risk assessment. Small MJ Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1289-308. PubMed ID: 18844862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards quantitative uncertainty assessment for cancer risks: central estimates and probability distributions of risk in dose-response modeling. Kopylev L; Chen C; White P Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Dec; 49(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 17905499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Addressing nonlinearity in the exposure-response relationship for a genotoxic carcinogen: cancer potency estimates for ethylene oxide. Kirman CR; Sweeney LM; Teta MJ; Sielken RL; Valdez-Flores C; Albertini RJ; Gargas ML Risk Anal; 2004 Oct; 24(5):1165-83. PubMed ID: 15563286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revised assessment of cancer risk to dichloromethane II. Application of probabilistic methods to cancer risk determinations. David RM; Clewell HJ; Gentry PR; Covington TR; Morgott DA; Marino DJ Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Jun; 45(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 16439044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incorporating additional biological phenomena into two-stage cancer models. Sielken RL; Bretzlaff RS; Stevenson DE Prog Clin Biol Res; 1994; 387():237-60. PubMed ID: 7972250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Regulatory cancer risk assessment based on a quick estimate of a benchmark dose derived from the maximum tolerated dose. Gaylor DW; Swirsky Gold L Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1998 Dec; 28(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 10049793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cancer dose--response assessment for acrylonitrile based upon rodent brain tumor incidence: use of epidemiologic, mechanistic, and pharmacokinetic support for nonlinearity. Kirman CR; Gargas ML; Marsh GM; Strother DE; Klaunig JE; Collins JJ; Deskin R Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Oct; 43(1):85-103. PubMed ID: 16099568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Uncertainties in the CIIT model for formaldehyde-induced carcinogenicity in the rat: a limited sensitivity analysis-I. Subramaniam RP; Crump KS; Van Landingham C; White P; Chen C; Schlosser PM Risk Anal; 2007 Oct; 27(5):1237-54. PubMed ID: 18076493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An adjustment factor for mode-of-action uncertainty with dual-mode carcinogens: the case of naphthalene-induced nasal tumors in rats. Bogen KT Risk Anal; 2008 Aug; 28(4):1033-51. PubMed ID: 18564993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revised assessment of cancer risk to dichloromethane: part I Bayesian PBPK and dose-response modeling in mice. Marino DJ; Clewell HJ; Gentry PR; Covington TR; Hack CE; David RM; Morgott DA Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Jun; 45(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 16442684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The benchmark dose method--review of available models, and recommendations for application in health risk assessment. Filipsson AF; Sand S; Nilsson J; Victorin K Crit Rev Toxicol; 2003; 33(5):505-42. PubMed ID: 14594105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality. Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethyl methanesulfonate toxicity in Viracept--a comprehensive human risk assessment based on threshold data for genotoxicity. Müller L; Gocke E; Lavé T; Pfister T Toxicol Lett; 2009 Nov; 190(3):317-29. PubMed ID: 19443141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data. Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Joint propagation of variability and imprecision in assessing the risk of groundwater contamination. Baudrit C; Guyonnet D; Dubois D J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Aug; 93(1-4):72-84. PubMed ID: 17321003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Model uncertainty and risk estimation for experimental studies of quantal responses. Bailer AJ; Noble RB; Wheeler MW Risk Anal; 2005 Apr; 25(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 15876205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian methodology for model uncertainty using model performance data. Droguett EL; Mosleh A Risk Anal; 2008 Oct; 28(5):1457-76. PubMed ID: 18793282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Probabilistic dose-response modeling: case study using dichloromethane PBPK model results. Marino DJ; Starr TB Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2007 Dec; 49(3):285-300. PubMed ID: 17949874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study. Brunekreef B; Beelen R; Hoek G; Schouten L; Bausch-Goldbohm S; Fischer P; Armstrong B; Hughes E; Jerrett M; van den Brandt P Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Mar; (139):5-71; discussion 73-89. PubMed ID: 19554969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]