These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18845443)

  • 1. A computer model of the Bystander effect: effects of individual behaviours on the population response.
    Richard M; Webb RP; Kirkby KJ; Kirkby NF
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009 Mar; 67(3):440-2. PubMed ID: 18845443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation response of primary human skin fibroblasts and their bystander cells after exposure to counted particles at low and high LET.
    Frankenberg D; Greif KD; Giesen U
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 Jan; 82(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 16546904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lack of hyper-radiosensitivity and induced radioresistance and of bystander effect in V79 cells after proton irradiation of different energies.
    Cherubini R; De Nadal V; Gerardi S; Guryev D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Feb; 143(2-4):315-9. PubMed ID: 21113063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The sequential irradiation of mammalian cells with X rays and charged particles of high LET.
    Bird RP; Zaider M; Rossi HH; Hall EJ; Marino SA; Rohrig N
    Radiat Res; 1983 Mar; 93(3):444-52. PubMed ID: 6856752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biological effectiveness of (12)C and (20)Ne ions with very high LET.
    Czub J; Banaś D; Błaszczyk A; Braziewicz J; Buraczewska I; Choinski J; Gorak U; Jaskoła M; Korman A; Lankoff A; Lisowska H; Lukaszek A; Szeflinski Z; Wojcik A
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2008 Oct; 84(10):821-9. PubMed ID: 18979317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lack of bystander effects from high-LET radiation for early cytogenetic end points.
    Groesser T; Cooper B; Rydberg B
    Radiat Res; 2008 Dec; 170(6):794-802. PubMed ID: 19138042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of dose rate on the radiation-induced bystander response.
    Gow MD; Seymour CB; Byun SH; Mothersill CE
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(1):119-32. PubMed ID: 18182691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of low and high LET radiations on bystander human lung fibroblast cell survival.
    Baskar R; Balajee AS; Geard CR
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2007 Aug; 83(8):551-9. PubMed ID: 17613128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inactivation of synchronized Chinese Hamster V79 cells with charged-particle track segments.
    Bird RP; Rohrig N; Colvett RD; Geard CR; Marino SA
    Radiat Res; 1980 May; 82(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 6246560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modelling radiation-induced bystander effect and cellular communication.
    Ballarini F; Alloni D; Facoetti A; Mairani A; Nano R; Ottolenghi A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):244-51. PubMed ID: 17142819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probabilistic two-stage model of cell inactivation by ionizing particles.
    Kundrát P; Lokajícek M; Hromcíková H
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(7):1433-47. PubMed ID: 15798334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of different dose rates on cell recovery and RBE at different spatial positions during protracted conformal radiotherapy.
    Herskind C; Schalla S; Hahn EW; Höver KH; Wenz F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 122(1-4):498-505. PubMed ID: 17223644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cellular response to modulated radiation fields.
    Mackonis EC; Suchowerska N; Zhang M; Ebert M; McKenzie DR; Jackson M
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(18):5469-82. PubMed ID: 17804876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammalian cell killing by ultrasoft X rays and high-energy radiation: an extension of the MK model.
    Hawkins RB
    Radiat Res; 2006 Aug; 166(2):431-42. PubMed ID: 16881744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental validation of the new nanodosimetry-based cell survival model for mixed neutron and gamma-ray irradiation.
    Wang CK; Zhang X; Gifford I; Burgett E; Adams V; Al-Sheikhly M
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 52(17):N367-74. PubMed ID: 17762072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation-induced adaptive response in fish cell lines.
    Ryan LA; Seymour CB; O'Neill-Mehlenbacher A; Mothersill CE
    J Environ Radioact; 2008 Apr; 99(4):739-47. PubMed ID: 18054128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sequential exposures of mammalian cells to low- and high-LET radiations. I. Lethal effects following X-ray and neon-ion irradiation.
    Ngo FQ; Blakely EA; Tobias CA
    Radiat Res; 1981 Jul; 87(1):59-78. PubMed ID: 7255673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MIRD continuing education: Bystander and low dose-rate effects: are these relevant to radionuclide therapy?
    Sgouros G; Knox SJ; Joiner MC; Morgan WF; Kassis AI
    J Nucl Med; 2007 Oct; 48(10):1683-91. PubMed ID: 17873139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bystander signal production and response are independent processes which are cell line dependent.
    Vines AM; Lyng FM; McClean B; Seymour C; Mothersill CE
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2008 Feb; 84(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 18246477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A composite microdose Adaptive Response (AR) and Bystander Effect (BE) model-application to low LET and high LET AR and BE data.
    Leonard BE
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2008 Aug; 84(8):681-701. PubMed ID: 18661382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.