455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18845731)
1. Neutralizing the impact factor culture.
Notkins AL
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):191. PubMed ID: 18845731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The impact factor and editorial decisions].
Matías-Guiu J; García-Ramos R
Neurologia; 2008; 23(6):342-8. PubMed ID: 18597189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What weight does impact factor carry?
Aase S
J Am Diet Assoc; 2008 Oct; 108(10):1604-7. PubMed ID: 18926118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Painful publishing.
Raff M; Johnson A; Walter P
Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5885):36. PubMed ID: 18599755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation.
Falagas ME; Alexiou VG
Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 18661263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact factor game. It is time to find a better way to assess the scientific literature.
The
PLoS Med; 2006 Jun; 3(6):e291. PubMed ID: 16749869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The misused impact factor.
Simons K
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):165. PubMed ID: 18845714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The peer review process III: when the decision is made.
Riss P
Int Urogynecol J; 2012 Jul; 23(7):811-2. PubMed ID: 21901436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of the impact factor.
Manske PR
J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Nov; 29(6):983-6. PubMed ID: 15576205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of the impact factor on publication in critical care nursing.
Egerod I
Nurs Crit Care; 2008; 13(4):184. PubMed ID: 18577169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. 'Impact factor' and 'immediacy index' of The National Medical Journal of India.
Menezes RG; Mohankumar TS
Natl Med J India; 2006; 19(5):295-6. PubMed ID: 17203690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An update on the Journal's progress.
Brennan PA
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 47(6):435-7. PubMed ID: 19643516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving the "impact" of academic psychiatry.
Coverdale JH; Weiss Roberts L; Balon R; Louie AK; Beresin EV
Acad Psychiatry; 2008; 32(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 18467469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Too much of a good thing….
Julian T
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Oct; 17(4):371. PubMed ID: 24077310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Result-based financing of medical research].
Johannessen A; Erik Gilhus N
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Mar; 129(7):638-41. PubMed ID: 19337335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Medical Hypotheses 2006 impact factor rises to 1.3--a vindication of the 'editorial review' system for revolutionary science.
Charlton BG
Med Hypotheses; 2007; 69(5):967-9. PubMed ID: 17706892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific publishing. PNAS nixes special privileges for (most) papers.
Kean S
Science; 2009 Sep; 325(5947):1486-7. PubMed ID: 19762615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Challenging the tyranny of impact factors.
Colquhoun D
Nature; 2003 May; 423(6939):479; discussion 480. PubMed ID: 12774093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. JPGM 2007-12: the editor's report.
Bavdekar SB
J Postgrad Med; 2012; 58(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 22718051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Journals: impact factors are too highly valued.
Davies J
Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):210. PubMed ID: 12529611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
