76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18845993)
1. The radiation exposure from portal images during the course of breast radiotherapy.
Wang X; Du W; Smith SA; Stovall M; Buchholz TA; Salehpour M
Am J Clin Oncol; 2008 Aug; 31(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 18845993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dose comparison of megavoltage cone-beam and orthogonal-pair portal images.
Peng LC; Yang CC; Sim S; Weiss M; Bielajew A
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 8(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 17592447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contralateral breast doses following radiotherapy of the breast and regional lymph nodes: Measurements and treatment planning calculations.
Johansen S; Olsen DR; Danielsen T; Malinen E
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Mar; 82(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 16962677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contralateral breast dose from chest wall and breast irradiation: local experience.
Alzoubi AS; Kandaiya S; Shukri A; Elsherbieny E
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2010 Jun; 33(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 20309667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contralateral breast dose after whole-breast irradiation: an analysis by treatment technique.
Williams TM; Moran JM; Hsu SH; Marsh R; Yanke B; Fraass BA; Pierce LJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):2079-85. PubMed ID: 21489713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) reduces the dose to the contralateral breast when compared to conventional tangential fields for primary breast irradiation.
Bhatnagar AK; Brandner E; Sonnik D; Wu A; Kalnicki S; Deutsch M; Heron DE
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Mar; 96(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16244787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Dosimetric evaluation of intensity-modulated tangential beam versus conventional tangential irradiation for breast cancer].
Huang XB; Jiang GL; Chen JY; Chen LF; Hu WG
Ai Zheng; 2006 Jul; 25(7):855-60. PubMed ID: 16831277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multileaf field-in-field forward-planned intensity-modulated dose compensation for whole-breast irradiation is associated with reduced contralateral breast dose: a phantom model comparison.
Borghero YO; Salehpour M; McNeese MD; Stovall M; Smith SA; Johnson J; Perkins GH; Strom EA; Oh JL; Kirsner SM; Woodward WA; Yu TK; Buchholz TA
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Mar; 82(3):324-8. PubMed ID: 17157944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional dose distribution of tangential breast irradiation: results of a multicentre phantom dosimetry study.
Delaney G; Beckham W; Veness M; Ahern V; Back M; Boyages J; Fox C; Graham P; Jacob G; Lonergan D; Morgan G; Pendlebury S; Yuile P
Radiother Oncol; 2000 Oct; 57(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 11033190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A planning comparison of dose patterns in organs at risk and predicted risk for radiation induced malignancy in the contralateral breast following radiation therapy of primary breast using conventional, IMRT and volumetric modulated arc treatment techniques.
Johansen S; Cozzi L; Olsen DR
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 19169915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contralateral breast radiation doses in breast cancer patients treated with helical tomotherapy.
Oymak E; Bozca R; Guler OC; Onal C
Med Dosim; 2023 Spring; 48(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 36572598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An evaluation of radiation exposure from portal films taken during definitive course of pediatric radiotherapy.
Kudchadker RJ; Chang EL; Bryan F; Maor MH; Famiglietti R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jul; 59(4):1229-35. PubMed ID: 15234060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of wedge versus segmented techniques in whole breast irradiation: effects on dose exposure outside the treatment volume.
Ludwig V; Schwab F; Guckenberger M; Krieger T; Flentje M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 Jun; 184(6):307-12. PubMed ID: 18535806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multisegmented tangential breast fields: a rational way to treat breast cancer.
Gulybán A; Kovács P; Sebestyén Z; Farkas R; Csere T; Karácsonyi G; Dérczy K; Hideghéty K; Esik O
Strahlenther Onkol; 2008 May; 184(5):262-9. PubMed ID: 18427757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose to the contralateral breast due to primary breast irradiation.
Fraass BA; Roberson PL; Lichter AS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1985 Mar; 11(3):485-97. PubMed ID: 3972661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose to contralateral breast: a comparison of four primary breast irradiation techniques.
Kelly CA; Wang XY; Chu JC; Hartsell WF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Feb; 34(3):727-32. PubMed ID: 8621298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the surface radiation dose and dose gradient in early stage breast cancer using high-dose-rate brachytherapy MammoSite applicator.
Sadeghi A; Prestidge B; Lee JM; Rosenthal A
Brachytherapy; 2006; 5(4):230-4. PubMed ID: 17118315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Active minimisation of radiation scatter during breast radiotherapy: management implications for young patients with good-prognosis primary neoplasms.
Epstein RJ; Kelly SA; Cook M; Bateman A; Paddick I; Kam KC; Dunn P; Hanham IW; Dale RG; Price PM
Radiother Oncol; 1996 Jul; 40(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 8844891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of administered dose using portal images in craniospinal irradiation of pediatric patients.
Coelho CM; Calçada R; Rodrigues S; Barragán JA; Sá AC; Macedo AP; de Fátima Monsanto M
Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Sep; 10(3):274-278. PubMed ID: 28324390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast-conserving radiation therapy: potential of inverse planning with intensity modulation.
Smitt MC; Li SD; Shostak CA; Chang W; Boyer AL
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):871-6. PubMed ID: 9169719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
