BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18846065)

  • 1. Fuelling the 9 billion.
    Martindale W; Trewavas A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Oct; 26(10):1068-70. PubMed ID: 18846065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Off the rails.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):247. PubMed ID: 18327213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Off the rails or on the mark?
    Chataway J; Tait J; Wield D
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 May; 26(5):500-1. PubMed ID: 18464777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Off the rails or on the mark?
    Heinemann JA
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 May; 26(5):499-500. PubMed ID: 18464776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. US-Indian agbiotech deal under scrutiny.
    Jayaraman KS
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 May; 24(5):481. PubMed ID: 16680115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A model protocol to assess the risks of agricultural introductions.
    Barton J; Crandon J; Kennedy D; Miller H
    Nat Biotechnol; 1997 Sep; 15(9):845-8. PubMed ID: 9306396
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bogged down in CAP reform.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):753. PubMed ID: 12147983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The costly benefits of opposing agricultural biotechnology.
    Apel A
    N Biotechnol; 2010 Nov; 27(5):635-40. PubMed ID: 20472105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The 20-year African biotech plan.
    Singh JA; Daar AS
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):272-4. PubMed ID: 18327231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Flies in the soup--European GM labeling legislation.
    Craddock N
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):383-4. PubMed ID: 15060547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Agricultural biotechnology in India: prospects and challenges.
    Tuli R; Sawant SV; Trivedi PK; Singh PK; Nath P
    Biotechnol J; 2009 Mar; 4(3):319-28. PubMed ID: 19253323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Agbio keeps on growing.
    Lawrence S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Mar; 23(3):281. PubMed ID: 15765074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chinese agribiotech: Against the grain.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6928):111-2. PubMed ID: 12634752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Caution in China over GM crops.
    Niu C
    Science; 2003 Feb; 299(5609):1013. PubMed ID: 12586923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: the case of regulating genetically modified crops.
    Smyth S; McHughen A
    Plant Biotechnol J; 2008 Apr; 6(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 18028290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Plant biotechs defect.
    Aldridge S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Mar; 26(3):255. PubMed ID: 18327220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Terminator no solution to gene flow.
    Shand H
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Aug; 20(8):775-6. PubMed ID: 12147996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Plant science. China plans $3.5 billion GM crops initiative.
    Stone R
    Science; 2008 Sep; 321(5894):1279. PubMed ID: 18772402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transgenic crops. China takes a bumpy road from the lab to the field.
    Yimin D; Mervis J
    Science; 2002 Dec; 298(5602):2317-9. PubMed ID: 12493892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Cartagena protocol and GMOs.
    Pythoud F
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Nov; 22(11):1347-8. PubMed ID: 15529146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.