BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18846550)

  • 1. Shear fatigue micromechanics of the cement-bone interface: An in vitro study using digital image correlation techniques.
    Mann KA; Miller MA; Race A; Verdonschot N
    J Orthop Res; 2009 Mar; 27(3):340-6. PubMed ID: 18846550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A fatigue damage model for the cement-bone interface.
    Kim DG; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2004 Oct; 37(10):1505-12. PubMed ID: 15336925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Creep dominates tensile fatigue damage of the cement-bone interface.
    Kim DG; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Orthop Res; 2004 May; 22(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 15099645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of cement creep and cement fatigue damage on the micromechanics of the cement-bone interface.
    Waanders D; Janssen D; Mann KA; Verdonschot N
    J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):3028-34. PubMed ID: 20692663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fatigue creep damage at the cement-bone interface: an experimental and a micro-mechanical finite element study.
    Waanders D; Janssen D; Miller MA; Mann KA; Verdonschot N
    J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2513-9. PubMed ID: 19682690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Creep behavior of hand-mixed Simplex P bone cement under cyclic tensile loading.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    J Appl Biomater; 1994; 5(3):235-43. PubMed ID: 10147450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fatigue of the cement/bone interface: the surface texture of bone and loosening.
    Arola D; Stoffel KA; Yang DT
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2006 Feb; 76(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 16080159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Early cement damage around a femoral stem is concentrated at the cement/bone interface.
    Race A; Miller MA; Ayers DC; Mann KA
    J Biomech; 2003 Apr; 36(4):489-96. PubMed ID: 12600339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experimental micromechanics of the cement-bone interface.
    Mann KA; Miller MA; Cleary RJ; Janssen D; Verdonschot N
    J Orthop Res; 2008 Jun; 26(6):872-9. PubMed ID: 18253965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixed-mode failure response of the cement-bone interface.
    Mann KA; Mocarski R; Damron LA; Allen MJ; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 2001 Nov; 19(6):1153-61. PubMed ID: 11781018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface.
    Bishop NE; Ferguson S; Tepic S
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 May; 78(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 8636165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pre-yield and post-yield shear behavior of the cement-bone interface.
    Mann KA; Allen MJ; Ayers DC
    J Orthop Res; 1998 May; 16(3):370-8. PubMed ID: 9671933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite element simulation of cement-bone interface micromechanics: a comparison to experimental results.
    Janssen D; Mann KA; Verdonschot N
    J Orthop Res; 2009 Oct; 27(10):1312-8. PubMed ID: 19340877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sustained pressurization of polymethylmethacrylate: a comparison of low- and moderate-viscosity bone cements.
    Bean DJ; Hollis JM; Woo SL; Convery FR
    J Orthop Res; 1988; 6(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 3379511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone creep and short and long term subsidence after cemented stem total hip arthroplasty (THA).
    Norman TL; Shultz T; Noble G; Gruen TA; Blaha JD
    J Biomech; 2013 Mar; 46(5):949-55. PubMed ID: 23357700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone-cement interface of the glenoid component: stress analysis for varying cement thickness.
    Terrier A; Büchler P; Farron A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):710-7. PubMed ID: 15961203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical strength of the cement-bone interface is greater in shear than in tension.
    Mann KA; Werner FW; Ayers DC
    J Biomech; 1999 Nov; 32(11):1251-4. PubMed ID: 10541077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic creep behavior of acrylic bone cement.
    Verdonschot N; Huiskes R
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 May; 29(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 7622542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of 2 modern femoral cementing techniques: analysis by cement-bone interface pressure measurements, computerized image analysis, and static mechanical testing.
    Reading AD; McCaskie AW; Barnes MR; Gregg PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2000 Jun; 15(4):479-87. PubMed ID: 10884209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computational assessment of the effect of polyethylene wear rate, mantle thickness, and porosity on the mechanical failure of the acetabular cement mantle.
    Coultrup OJ; Hunt C; Wroblewski BM; Taylor M
    J Orthop Res; 2010 May; 28(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 19950359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.