BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

715 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18847652)

  • 1. Comparison of risk adjustment methodologies in surgical quality improvement.
    Steinberg SM; Popa MR; Michalek JA; Bethel MJ; Ellison EC
    Surgery; 2008 Oct; 144(4):662-7; discussion 662-7. PubMed ID: 18847652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating alternative risk-adjustment strategies for surgery.
    Atherly A; Fink AS; Campbell DC; Mentzer RM; Henderson W; Khuri S; Culler SD
    Am J Surg; 2004 Nov; 188(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 15546571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing surgical quality using administrative and clinical data sets: a direct comparison of the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Database and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set.
    Davenport DL; Holsapple CW; Conigliaro J
    Am J Med Qual; 2009; 24(5):395-402. PubMed ID: 19584374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Hutter MM; Rowell KS; Devaney LA; Sokal SM; Warshaw AL; Abbott WM; Hodin RA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Nov; 203(5):618-24. PubMed ID: 17084322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.
    Hall BL; Hamilton BH; Richards K; Bilimoria KY; Cohen ME; Ko CY
    Ann Surg; 2009 Sep; 250(3):363-76. PubMed ID: 19644350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study.
    Khuri SF; Henderson WG; Daley J; Jonasson O; Jones RS; Campbell DA; Fink AS; Mentzer RM; Neumayer L; Hammermeister K; Mosca C; Healey N;
    Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 18650645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of specific quality improvement opportunities for the elderly undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.
    Bentrem DJ; Cohen ME; Hynes DM; Ko CY; Bilimoria KY
    Arch Surg; 2009 Nov; 144(11):1013-20. PubMed ID: 19917937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing a NSQIP module to measure outcomes in children's surgical care: opportunity and challenge.
    Dillon P; Hammermeister K; Morrato E; Kempe A; Oldham K; Moss L; Marchildon M; Ziegler M; Steeger J; Rowell K; Shiloach M; Henderson W
    Semin Pediatr Surg; 2008 May; 17(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18395663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of national surgical quality improvement program data as a catalyst for quality improvement.
    Rowell KS; Turrentine FE; Hutter MM; Khuri SF; Henderson WG
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jun; 204(6):1293-300. PubMed ID: 17544087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of the reliability of data collected for the Department of Veterans Affairs national surgical quality improvement program.
    Davis CL; Pierce JR; Henderson W; Spencer CD; Tyler C; Langberg R; Swafford J; Felan GS; Kearns MA; Booker B
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Apr; 204(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17382213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How best to measure surgical quality? Comparison of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators (AHRQ-PSI) and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) postoperative adverse events at a single institution.
    Cima RR; Lackore KA; Nehring SA; Cassivi SD; Donohue JH; Deschamps C; Vansuch M; Naessens JM
    Surgery; 2011 Nov; 150(5):943-9. PubMed ID: 21875734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association of surgical care improvement project infection-related process measure compliance with risk-adjusted outcomes: implications for quality measurement.
    Ingraham AM; Cohen ME; Bilimoria KY; Dimick JB; Richards KE; Raval MV; Fleisher LA; Hall BL; Ko CY
    J Am Coll Surg; 2010 Dec; 211(6):705-14. PubMed ID: 21109157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk adjustment in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: a comparison of logistic versus hierarchical modeling.
    Cohen ME; Dimick JB; Bilimoria KY; Ko CY; Richards K; Hall BL
    J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Dec; 209(6):687-93. PubMed ID: 19959035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is risk-adjusted mortality an indicator of quality of care in general surgery?: a comparison of risk adjustment to peer review.
    Shackford SR; Hyman N; Ben-Jacob T; Ratliff J
    Ann Surg; 2010 Sep; 252(3):452-8; discussion 458-9. PubMed ID: 20739845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity in Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals and selected university medical centers: general surgical operations in women.
    Fink AS; Hutter MM; Campbell DC; Henderson WG; Mosca C; Khuri SF
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Jun; 204(6):1127-36. PubMed ID: 17544071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of mortality risk adjustment using a clinical data algorithm (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) and an administrative data algorithm (Solucient) at the case level within a single institution.
    Hall BL; Hirbe M; Waterman B; Boslaugh S; Dunagan WC
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Dec; 205(6):767-77. PubMed ID: 18035260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quality assurance in heart surgery. General and personal concepts].
    Nollert G; Reichart B
    Herz; 1996 Dec; 21(6):383-8. PubMed ID: 9081907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care.
    Khuri SF; Daley J; Henderson W; Barbour G; Lowry P; Irvin G; Gibbs J; Grover F; Hammermeister K; Stremple JF
    J Am Coll Surg; 1995 May; 180(5):519-31. PubMed ID: 7749526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adjusted or unadjusted outcomes.
    Fink AS
    Am J Surg; 2009 Nov; 198(5 Suppl):S28-35. PubMed ID: 19874931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Association of hospital participation in a surgical outcomes monitoring program with inpatient complications and mortality.
    Etzioni DA; Wasif N; Dueck AC; Cima RR; Hohmann SF; Naessens JM; Mathur AK; Habermann EB
    JAMA; 2015 Feb; 313(5):505-11. PubMed ID: 25647206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.