256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18848480)
1. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and the electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in amblyopic children aged 5 to 11 years.
Birch EE; Strauber SF; Beck RW; Holmes JM;
J AAPOS; 2009 Feb; 13(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 18848480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Visual Acuity Results Between ATS-HOTV and E-ETDRS Testing Methods in Children With Optic Pathway Gliomas.
Avery RA; Go C; Fisher MJ; Liu GT; Garcia A; Richter M; McGeehan B; Quinn GE; Ying GS
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Mar; 11(3):10. PubMed ID: 35262649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the HOTV and Lea symbols visual acuity tests in patients with amblyopia.
Ruttum MS; Dahlgren M
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2006; 43(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 16761636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of logMAR ETDRS chart and a new computerised staircased procedure for assessment of the visual acuity of children.
Stewart CE; Hussey A; Davies N; Moseley MJ
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Nov; 26(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 17040424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
Brown SM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Sep; 138(3):512; author reply 512-3. PubMed ID: 15364255
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Portable acuity screening for any school: validation of patched HOTV with amblyopic patients and Bangerter normals.
Tsao Wu M; Armitage MD; Trujillo C; Trujillo A; Arnold LE; Tsao Wu L; Arnold RW
BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):232. PubMed ID: 29202721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.
Laidlaw DA; Tailor V; Shah N; Atamian S; Harcourt C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17993577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Normative visual acuity in infants and preschool-aged children in Sydney.
Leone JF; Mitchell P; Kifley A; Rose KA;
Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Nov; 92(7):e521-9. PubMed ID: 24606232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of colored crowding bars on the HOTV visual acuity test in amblyopic patients.
Ruttum MS; Covert DJ
J AAPOS; 2008 Aug; 12(4):361-4. PubMed ID: 18708008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual acuity testability and comparability in Australian preschool children: the Sydney Paediatric Eye Disease Study.
Leone JF; Gole GA; Mitchell P; Kifley A; Pai AS; Rose KA
Eye (Lond); 2012 Jul; 26(7):925-32. PubMed ID: 22498798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should tumbling E go out of date in amblyopia screening? Evidence from a population-based sample normative in children aged 3-4 years.
Guimaraes S; Fernandes T; Costa P; Silva E
Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 102(6):761-766. PubMed ID: 28988161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The accuracy of the amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.
Felius J; Wang YZ; Birch EE
J AAPOS; 2003 Dec; 7(6):406-12. PubMed ID: 14730293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Normative pediatric visual acuity using single surrounded HOTV optotypes on the Electronic Visual Acuity Tester following the Amblyopia Treatment Study protocol.
Drover JR; Felius J; Cheng CS; Morale SE; Wyatt L; Birch EE
J AAPOS; 2008 Apr; 12(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 18155943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Crowded letter and crowded picture logMAR acuity in children with amblyopia: a quantitative comparison.
O'Boyle C; Chen SI; Little JA
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):457-461. PubMed ID: 27388249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distance versus near visual acuity in amblyopia.
Christoff A; Repka MX; Kaminski BM; Holmes JM;
J AAPOS; 2011 Aug; 15(4):342-4. PubMed ID: 21907115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol.
Beck RW; Moke PS; Turpin AH; Ferris FL; SanGiovanni JP; Johnson CA; Birch EE; Chandler DL; Cox TA; Blair RC; Kraker RT
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 12566024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The amblyopia treatment study visual acuity testing protocol.
Holmes JM; Beck RW; Repka MX; Leske DA; Kraker RT; Blair RC; Moke PS; Birch EE; Saunders RA; Hertle RW; Quinn GE; Simons KA; Miller JM;
Arch Ophthalmol; 2001 Sep; 119(9):1345-53. PubMed ID: 11545641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Threshold visual acuity testing of preschool children using the crowded HOTV and Lea Symbols acuity tests.
Cyert L; Schmidt P; Maguire M; Moore B; Dobson V; Quinn G;
J AAPOS; 2003 Dec; 7(6):396-9. PubMed ID: 14730291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of the electronic early treatment diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol in children 7 to <13 years old.
Cotter SA; Chu RH; Chandler DL; Beck RW; Holmes JM; Rice ML; Hertle RW; Birch EE; Moke PS
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Oct; 136(4):655-61. PubMed ID: 14516805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
