These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18849126)

  • 1. Will the introduction of an emotional context affect fingerprint analysis and decision-making?
    Hall LJ; Player E
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Oct; 181(1-3):36-9. PubMed ID: 18849126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications.
    Dror IE; Charlton D; Péron AE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jan; 156(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 16325362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Concerning L.J. Hall, E. Player, "Will the introduction of an emotional context affect fingerprint analysis and decision-making?" [Forensic Sci. Int. 181 (2008) 36-39].
    Saks MJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Oct; 191(1-3):e19; author reply e21. PubMed ID: 19616906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analytically quantifying the reliability and biasability of forensic experts.
    Dror I; Rosenthal R
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):900-3. PubMed ID: 18489557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Informing the judgments of fingerprint analysts using quality metric and statistical assessment tools.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Genessay T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):183-98. PubMed ID: 22269131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23876092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fingermark submission decision-making within a UK fingerprint laboratory: Do experts get the marks that they need?
    Earwaker H; Morgan RM; Harris AJ; Hall LJ
    Sci Justice; 2015 Jul; 55(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 26087871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The potential (negative) influence of observational biases at the analysis stage of fingermark individualisation.
    Schiffer B; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Apr; 167(2-3):116-20. PubMed ID: 16876354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Expert judgement in a risk assessment model for Salmonella spp. in pork: the performance of different weighting schemes.
    Boone I; Van der Stede Y; Bollaerts K; Messens W; Vose D; Daube G; Aerts M; Mintiens K
    Prev Vet Med; 2009 Nov; 92(3):224-34. PubMed ID: 19782415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The expert consensus guideline series. Optimizing pharmacologic treatment of psychotic disorders. Introduction: methods, commentary, and summary.
    Kane JM; Leucht S; Carpenter D; Docherty JP;
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2003; 64 Suppl 12():5-19. PubMed ID: 14640142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A neural network reflecting individual differences in cognitive processing of emotions during perceptual decision making.
    Mériau K; Wartenburger I; Kazzer P; Prehn K; Lammers CH; van der Meer E; Villringer A; Heekeren HR
    Neuroimage; 2006 Nov; 33(3):1016-27. PubMed ID: 16973382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sadder but wiser or happier and smarter? A demonstration of judgment and decision making.
    Chuang SC
    J Psychol; 2007 Jan; 141(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 17312687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Emotional experiences and motivating factors associated with fingerprint analysis.
    Charlton D; Fraser-Mackenzie PA; Dror IE
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Mar; 55(2):385-93. PubMed ID: 20158594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of protocols and professional judgement in emergency medical dispatching.
    Farand L; Leprohon J; Kalina M; Champagne F; Contandriopoulos AP; Preker A
    Eur J Emerg Med; 1995 Sep; 2(3):136-48. PubMed ID: 9422199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrepancies in expert decision-making in forensic fingerprint examination.
    Mustonen V; Hakkarainen K; Tuunainen J; Pohjola P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():215-26. PubMed ID: 26254629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of human-technology cooperation and distributed cognition in forensic science: biasing effects of AFIS contextual information on human experts.
    Dror IE; Wertheim K; Fraser-Mackenzie P; Walajtys J
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 22212067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive issues in fingerprint analysis: inter- and intra-expert consistency and the effect of a 'target' comparison.
    Dror IE; Champod C; Langenburg G; Charlton D; Hunt H; Rosenthal R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):10-7. PubMed ID: 21129867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
    Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
    Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expertise in fingerprint identification.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1519-30. PubMed ID: 23786258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the neurological substrate of emotional and social intelligence.
    Bar-On R; Tranel D; Denburg NL; Bechara A
    Brain; 2003 Aug; 126(Pt 8):1790-800. PubMed ID: 12805102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.