267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18849636)
21. Macular retinal sensitivity using MP-1 in healthy Malaysian subjects of different ages.
Ismail SA; Sharanjeet-Kaur ; Mutalib HA; Ngah NF
J Optom; 2015; 8(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 26025808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Fixation characteristics of patients with macular degeneration recorded with the mp-1 microperimeter.
Tarita-Nistor L; González EG; Markowitz SN; Steinbach MJ
Retina; 2008 Jan; 28(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 18185148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Measuring retinal sensitivity with the microperimeter in patients with diabetes.
Nittala MG; Gella L; Raman R; Sharma T
Retina; 2012 Jul; 32(7):1302-9. PubMed ID: 22450513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reading performance is reduced by parafoveal scotomas in patients with macular telangiectasia type 2.
Finger RP; Charbel Issa P; Fimmers R; Holz FG; Rubin GS; Scholl HP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Mar; 50(3):1366-70. PubMed ID: 18997085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Retinal sensitivity measured with the micro perimeter 1 after resolution of central serous chorioretinopathy.
Ojima Y; Tsujikawa A; Hangai M; Nakanishi H; Inoue R; Sakamoto A; Yoshimura N
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jul; 146(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 18405876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fixation stability measurement using the MP1 microperimeter.
Crossland MD; Dunbar HM; Rubin GS
Retina; 2009 May; 29(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 19262440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fine matrix mapping of the macular region in normal subjects.
Wu D; Bird AC; Mcnaught A; Buckland MS; Fitzke FW
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1995 Jul; 31(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 8745513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Normative data for macular perimetry using the MP-3 microperimeter in healthy individuals.
Rodrigues Neto TDS; Silva Neto EDD; Higashi AH; Megnis BP; Haddad MAO; Monteiro MLR; Zacharias LC
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2023 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 37018820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fixation behavior in primary open angle glaucoma at early and moderate stage assessed by the MicroPerimeter MP-1.
Shi Y; Liu M; Wang X; Zhang C; Huang P
J Glaucoma; 2013 Feb; 22(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 21946547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preservation of visual sensitivity of older subjects: association with macular pigment density.
Hammond BR; Wooten BR; Snodderly DM
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1998 Feb; 39(2):397-406. PubMed ID: 9478000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Microperimetric biofeedback in AMD patients.
Vingolo EM; Cavarretta S; Domanico D; Parisi F; Malagola R
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2007 Dec; 32(3-4):185-9. PubMed ID: 17574525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Fixation stability using central and pericentral fixation targets in patients with age-related macular degeneration.
Bellmann C; Feely M; Crossland MD; Kabanarou SA; Rubin GS
Ophthalmology; 2004 Dec; 111(12):2265-70. PubMed ID: 15582084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fixation stability: a comparison between the Nidek MP-1 and the Rodenstock scanning laser ophthalmoscope in persons with and without diabetic maculopathy.
Dunbar HM; Crossland MD; Rubin GS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Aug; 51(8):4346-50. PubMed ID: 20335616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interexaminer and intraexaminer reliability of the microperimeter MP-1.
Weingessel B; Sacu S; Vécsei-Marlovits PV; Weingessel A; Richter-Mueksch S; Schmidt-Erfurth U
Eye (Lond); 2009 May; 23(5):1052-8. PubMed ID: 18670459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparison of macular translocation with patch graft in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Chen FK; Patel PJ; Uppal GS; Rubin GS; Coffey PJ; Aylward GW; Da Cruz L
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 50(4):1848-55. PubMed ID: 19060287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Microperimetry evaluation in central serous chorioretinopathy].
Chen H; Wu D; Huang S; Guan T; Liu C
Yan Ke Xue Bao; 2006 Sep; 22(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 17162898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Automatic static quantitative perimetry of the central 30 degrees visual field in normal subjects].
Huang YF
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 2507260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Automatic perimetry of the central visual field in diseases of the macula].
Janknecht P; Soriano JM; Funk J; Hansen LL
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Oct; 199(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 1762351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of fundus perimetry (microperimetry) to quantify macular sensitivity.
Rohrschneider K; Bültmann S; Springer C
Prog Retin Eye Res; 2008 Sep; 27(5):536-48. PubMed ID: 18723109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Low-vision rehabilitation by means of MP-1 biofeedback examination in patients with different macular diseases: a pilot study.
Vingolo EM; Salvatore S; Cavarretta S
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Jun; 34(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 19396541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
