These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

576 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18849692)

  • 41. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality.
    Hawking N; Elmore A
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 19457845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Efficient quality assurance programs in radiology and nuclear medicine in Ostergotland, Sweden.
    Sandborg M; Althén JN; Gustafsson A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):410-7. PubMed ID: 20181648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Bulgarian experience in the establishment of reference dose levels and implementation of a quality control system in diagnostic radiology.
    Vassileva J; Dimov A; Slavchev A; Karadjov A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 16464832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Quality assurance in x-ray diagnosis as specified in DIN 6868].
    Lenzen H; Wiesmann W
    Radiologe; 1988 Jan; 28(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 3344348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Applications of the quality control program in diagnostic radiology. Confirmation of results, clinical and managerial benefits].
    Bergamini C; Berardi P; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Pavlica P
    Radiol Med; 1994 Mar; 87(3):308-11. PubMed ID: 8146371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Quantifying radiation safety and quality in medical imaging, part 3: the quality assurance scorecard.
    Reiner BI
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Oct; 6(10):694-700. PubMed ID: 19800588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Quality assurance in the endoscopy unit: An emphasis on outcomes.
    Brown RD; Goldstein JL
    Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 1999 Oct; 9(4):595-607, vi. PubMed ID: 10495225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Interlaboratory comparison and accreditation in quality control testing of diagnostic X-ray equipment.
    Kepler K; Vladimirov A; Servomaa A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):198-200. PubMed ID: 15933108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Quality assurance and radiologic audit.
    Pitcher EM; Wells PN
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1992 Jun; 4(3):9-14. PubMed ID: 1581138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Radiation hygiene in medical X-ray imaging: part 2: Assessment of radiation exposure and radiation protection measures].
    Brix G; Veit R; Häusler U
    Radiologe; 2010 Oct; 50(10):913-25; quiz 926-7. PubMed ID: 20949346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Establishing a total quality assurance program in diagnostic radiology.
    Carlton R
    Radiol Technol; 1980; 52(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 6997921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Results of a patient dose survey on diagnostic radiology in Lithuania.
    Ziliukas J; Morkunas G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):172-5. PubMed ID: 15933102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [5 years quality assurance in accordance with the roentgen regulation. Benefits, costs, necessary innovations].
    Brandt GA; Schmidt T; Marciniak H; Mechte M; Mischke W
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 9172662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The quality of dental radiography in the Czech Republic--results of a TLD and film postal audit.
    Novák L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):155-8. PubMed ID: 16782748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. International guidance on the establishment of quality assurance programmes for radioactivity measurement in nuclear medicine.
    Zimmerman BE; Herbst C; Norenberg JP; Woods MJ
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2006; 64(10-11):1142-6. PubMed ID: 16934984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Diagnostic x-ray examinations in Poland in 2004 in view of the population exposure: the assessment of structure and trends].
    Staniszewska MA; Papierz S
    Med Pr; 2006; 57(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 17125031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Radiation protection standards: their evolution from science to philosophy.
    Dixon RL; Gray JE; Archer BR; Simpkin DJ
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 115(1-4):16-22. PubMed ID: 16381677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of methods to estimate the patient dose in interventional radiology.
    Kosunen A; Komppa T; Toivonen M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):178-84. PubMed ID: 16464835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Risk management from the perspective of the radiation protection officer. Consequences of new radiation protection laws in hospitals].
    Wolf KJ; Gergeleit M
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2003 Nov; 97(8-9):621-3. PubMed ID: 14710658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.