These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2019 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18849699)

  • 1. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Flat-panel detectors in X-ray systems].
    Spahn M; Heer V; Freytag R
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):340-50. PubMed ID: 12764582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functionality and operation of fluoroscopic automatic brightness control/automatic dose rate control logic in modern cardiovascular and interventional angiography systems: a report of Task Group 125 Radiography/Fluoroscopy Subcommittee, Imaging Physics Committee, Science Council.
    Rauch P; Lin PJ; Balter S; Fukuda A; Goode A; Hartwell G; LaFrance T; Nickoloff E; Shepard J; Strauss K
    Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2826-8. PubMed ID: 22559654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Management of pediatric radiation dose using GE fluoroscopic equipment.
    Belanger B; Boudry J
    Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):204-11. PubMed ID: 16862403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a CCD and a flat-panel digital system in an Interventional Cardiology Laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):93-6. PubMed ID: 16461500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-energy cardiac imaging: an image quality and dose comparison for a flat-panel detector and x-ray image intensifier.
    Ducote JL; Xu T; Molloi S
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):183-96. PubMed ID: 17183135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Flat-panel detector technology -State-of-the-art and future prospects-].
    Yamazaki T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):216-26. PubMed ID: 12766267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation exposure during elective coronary angioplasty: the effect of flat-panel detection.
    Prasan AM; Ison G; Rees DM
    Heart Lung Circ; 2008 Jun; 17(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 18242132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pediatric interventional radiography equipment: safety considerations.
    Strauss KJ
    Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):126-35. PubMed ID: 16862405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changing from image intensifier to flat detector technology for interventional cardiology procedures: a practical point of view.
    Bokou C; Schreiner-Karoussou A; Breisch R; Beissel J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):83-6. PubMed ID: 18448437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
    Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does digital flat detector technology tip the scale towards better image quality or reduced patient dose in interventional cardiology?
    Bogaert E; Bacher K; Lapere R; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):348-53. PubMed ID: 18789622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The operation logic of automatic dose control of fluoroscopy system in conjunction with spectral shaping filters.
    Lin PJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3169-72. PubMed ID: 17879779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Importance of dose settings in the x-ray systems used for interventional radiology: a national survey.
    Vano E; Sanchez R; Fernandez JM; Rosales F; Garcia MA; Sotil J; Hernandez J; Carrera F; Ciudad J; Soler MM; Ballester T
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 19052816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flat detectors and new aspects of radiation safety.
    Gurley JC
    Cardiol Clin; 2009 Aug; 27(3):385-94. PubMed ID: 19573712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The evolution of digital radiography: from storage phosphors to flat-panel detectors.
    Porcelli A; Maggi F; Spalvieri S; Meduri A; Marano P
    Rays; 2003; 28(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 14509175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic and interventional radiology: a strategy to introduce reference dose level taking into account the national practice.
    Verdun FR; Aroua A; Trueb PR; Vock P; Valley JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):188-91. PubMed ID: 15933106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physician-received scatter radiation with angiography systems used for interventional radiology: comparison among many X-ray systems.
    Chida K; Morishima Y; Inaba Y; Taura M; Ebata A; Takeda K; Shimura H; Zuguchi M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 May; 149(4):410-6. PubMed ID: 22117021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiographic quality control devices.
    Health Devices; 2000 Apr; 29(4):97-139. PubMed ID: 11002439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 101.