These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18849767)
1. Development of a web-based integrated birth defects surveillance system in New York State. Wang Y; Tao Z; Cross PK; Le LH; Steen PM; Babcock GD; Druschel CM; Hwang SA J Public Health Manag Pract; 2008; 14(6):E1-E10. PubMed ID: 18849767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of web-based geocoding applications for the population-based Birth Defects Surveillance System in New York state. Wang Y; Le LH; Wang X; Tao Z; Druschel CD; Cross PK; Hwang SA J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 20795565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementing a web-based case reporting and communication system among hospitals reporting to the birth defects registry in New York State. Steen PM; Wang Y; Tao Z; Cross PK; Druschel CM J Public Health Manag Pract; 2008; 14(6):E11-6. PubMed ID: 18849768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving case ascertainment of a population-based birth defects registry in New York State using hospital discharge data. Wang Y; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross PK; Druschel CM; Hwang SA Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):663-8. PubMed ID: 16240383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospital discharge data: can it serve as the sole source of case ascertainment for population-based birth defects surveillance programs? Wang Y; Cross PK; Druschel CM J Public Health Manag Pract; 2010; 16(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 20357611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Problems in using birth certificate files in the capture-recapture model to estimate the completeness of case ascertainment in a population-based birth defects registry in New York State. Wang Y; Druschel CM; Cross PK; Hwang SA; Gensburg LJ Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):772-7. PubMed ID: 17044070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Process of and problems in changing a birth defects registry reporting system. Druschel C; Sharpe-Stimac M; Cross P Teratology; 2001; 64 Suppl 1():S30-6. PubMed ID: 11745842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Registry data quality improvement by identifying discrepancies between assigned codes and text descriptions of birth defects. Richardson SD; Fox DJ; Wittman B J Registry Manag; 2013; 40(4):165-7. PubMed ID: 24625769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of CUSUM and Shewhart charts to monitor regional trends of birth defect reports in New York State. Babcock GD; Talbot TO; Rogerson PA; Forand SP Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2005 Oct; 73(10):669-78. PubMed ID: 16240377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Texas Birth Defects Registry: an active surveillance system. Miller E Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):787-92. PubMed ID: 17094140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Registry to referral: using birth defects registries to refer infants and toddlers for early intervention services. Farel AM; Meyer RE; Hicken M; Edmonds LD Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):647-50. PubMed ID: 14703788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Follow-up survey of parents of children with major birth defects in New York State. Sharpe-Stimac M; Wang Y; Druschel CM; Cross PK Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2004 Sep; 70(9):597-602. PubMed ID: 15368559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Developing a database management system to support birth defects surveillance in Florida. Salemi JL; Hauser KW; Tanner JP; Sampat D; Correia JA; Watkins SM; Kirby RS J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):10-5; quiz 38-9. PubMed ID: 20795564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methodological issues in setting up a surveillance system for birth defects in India. Suresh S; Thangavel G; Sujatha J; Indrani S Natl Med J India; 2005; 18(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 16433142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. National rates of birth defects among hospitalized newborns. Bird TM; Hobbs CA; Cleves MA; Tilford JM; Robbins JM Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2006 Nov; 76(11):762-9. PubMed ID: 17063529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fine-grained record integration and linkage tool. Jurczyk P; Lu JJ; Xiong L; Cragan JD; Correa A Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2008 Nov; 82(11):822-9. PubMed ID: 18985680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exploring the seasonality of birth defects in the New York State Congenital Malformations Registry. Caton AR Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2012 Jun; 94(6):424-37. PubMed ID: 22473628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Geocoding capacity of birth defects surveillance programs: results from the National Birth Defects Prevention Network Geocoding Survey. Wang Y; O'Leary LA; Rickard RS; Mason CA; J Registry Manag; 2010; 37(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 20795566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An Internet-based surveillance system for tuberculosis in Korea. Lew WJ; Lee EG; Bai JY; Kim HJ; Bai GH; Ahn DI; Lee JK; Kim SJ Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2006 Nov; 10(11):1241-7. PubMed ID: 17131783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating prevalence of fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS): effectiveness of a passive birth defects registry system. Fox DJ; Druschel CM Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2003 Sep; 67(9):604-8. PubMed ID: 14703781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]