These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1885097)

  • 1. [Fetal heart rate monitoring in ambulatory and resting mothers].
    Ovadia D; Mazor M; Glezerman M
    Harefuah; 1991 Apr; 120(8):436-9. PubMed ID: 1885097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maternal position during non-stress test and fetal heart rate patterns.
    Cito G; Luisi S; Mezzesimi A; Cavicchioli C; Calonaci G; Petraglia F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):335-8. PubMed ID: 15762962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonstress and contraction stress fetal heart rate monitoring. A randomized trial to determine which is the faster primary test.
    Newnham JP; Burns SE; Szczygielski C; Roberman B
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):356-60. PubMed ID: 3367336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective evaluation of the contraction stress and nonstress tests in the management of post-term pregnancy.
    Druzin ML; Karver ML; Wagner W; Hutson JM; Waltner A; Kogut E
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1992 Jun; 174(6):507-12. PubMed ID: 1595028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does Doppler-detected fetal movement decrease the incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests?
    Stanco LM; Rabello Y; Medearis AL; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 8233279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An active management approach to the postdate fetus with a reactive nonstress test and fetal heart rate decelerations.
    Small ML; Phelan JP; Smith CV; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 70(4):636-40. PubMed ID: 3627631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The startle test revisited.
    Miller JM; Rodriguez A; Gabert HA
    J Perinatol; 2004 Jul; 24(7):421-2. PubMed ID: 15152272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of fetal well-being using the nonstress test in the home setting.
    Naef RW; Morrison JC; Washburne JF; McLaughlin BN; Perry KG; Roberts WE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 84(3):424-6. PubMed ID: 8058242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Clinical application of the expert type terminal of remote electronic fetal heart rate home monitoring system].
    Su F; Guo X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 37(8):459-61. PubMed ID: 12411023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The contraction stress test.
    Pircon RA; Freeman RK
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1990 Mar; 17(1):129-46. PubMed ID: 2192315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The uses and limitations of the fetal biophysical profile.
    Oyelese Y; Vintzileos AM
    Clin Perinatol; 2011 Mar; 38(1):47-64, v-vi. PubMed ID: 21353089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The nonstress test. Criteria for the duration of fetal heart rate acceleration.
    Willis DC; Blanco JD; Hamblen KA; Stovall DW
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Sep; 35(9):901-3. PubMed ID: 2231567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NST vs CST: the nonstress test in high risk pregnancies.
    Cederlind CJ
    J Kans Med Soc; 1980 Feb; 81(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 7351510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maternal response to daily fetal movement counting in primary care settings.
    Eggertsen SC; Benedetti TJ
    Am J Perinatol; 1987 Oct; 4(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 3651191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of stressed and nonstressed antepartum fetal heart rate testing.
    Keane MW; Horger EO; Vice L
    Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 7465146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The duration of the outpatient nonstress test (NST) and the diagnosis of fetal reactivity with noncomputerized cardiotocography, A critical review of 1160 tracings].
    Cito G
    Minerva Ginecol; 1997; 49(1-2):35-8. PubMed ID: 9162883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Value of the uterine contraction stress test].
    Hohmann M; Künzel W
    Gynakologe; 1994 Jun; 27(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 7926955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maternal cardiac autonomic function and fetal heart rate in preeclamptic compared to normotensive pregnancies.
    Swansburg ML; Brown CA; Hains SM; Smith GN; Kisilevsky BS
    Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2005; 15(3):42-52. PubMed ID: 16295797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Value of endogenous uterine contraction stress test by breast nipple stimulation].
    Strowitzki T; Dollinger M; Schüssler B
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1990; 194(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 2316269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A review of the nonstress test.
    Knuppel RA; Lake M; Ingram JM
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Mar; 27(3):120-6. PubMed ID: 7086760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.