These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18851063)

  • 1. Epistasis and the selective advantage of sex and recombination.
    de Oliveira VM; da Silva JK; Campos PR
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):031905. PubMed ID: 18851063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.
    Keightley PD; Otto SP
    Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):89-92. PubMed ID: 16957730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction.
    MacCarthy T; Bergman A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jul; 104(31):12801-6. PubMed ID: 17646644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sex and deleterious mutations.
    Gordo I; Campos PR
    Genetics; 2008 May; 179(1):621-6. PubMed ID: 18493076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evolution of sex and recombination in response to abiotic or coevolutionary fluctuations in epistasis.
    Gandon S; Otto SP
    Genetics; 2007 Apr; 175(4):1835-53. PubMed ID: 17277371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of epistasis and linkage on fixation probability in three-locus models: an ancestral recombination-selection graph approach.
    Kermany AR; Lessard S
    Theor Popul Biol; 2012 Sep; 82(2):131-45. PubMed ID: 22634384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diploidy, population structure, and the evolution of recombination.
    Roze D
    Am Nat; 2009 Jul; 174 Suppl 1():S79-94. PubMed ID: 19476412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination.
    Charlesworth B
    Genet Res; 1990 Jun; 55(3):199-221. PubMed ID: 2394378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why sex and recombination?
    Barton NH; Charlesworth B
    Science; 1998 Sep; 281(5385):1986-90. PubMed ID: 9748151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination.
    Otto SP; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Apr; 51(2):134-47. PubMed ID: 9169238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time to fixation in the presence of recombination.
    Jain K
    Theor Popul Biol; 2010 Feb; 77(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 19843476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolution can favor antagonistic epistasis.
    Desai MM; Weissman D; Feldman MW
    Genetics; 2007 Oct; 177(2):1001-10. PubMed ID: 17720923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fixation probability in a two-locus model by the ancestral recombination-selection graph.
    Lessard S; Kermany AR
    Genetics; 2012 Feb; 190(2):691-707. PubMed ID: 22095080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of varying epistasis on the evolution of recombination.
    Kouyos RD; Otto SP; Bonhoeffer S
    Genetics; 2006 Jun; 173(2):589-97. PubMed ID: 16547114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic architecture and the evolution of sex.
    Lohaus R; Burch CL; Azevedo RB
    J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S142-57. PubMed ID: 20421324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reciprocal sign epistasis and truncation selection: When is recombination favorable in a pre-breeding program with a selfing species?
    Vagne C; David J; Tavaud M; Fontez B
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Dec; 386():44-54. PubMed ID: 26334476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative effects of segregation and recombination on the evolution of sex in finite diploid populations.
    Jiang X; Hu S; Xu Q; Chang Y; Tao S
    Heredity (Edinb); 2013 Dec; 111(6):505-12. PubMed ID: 23900397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interlocus sexually antagonistic coevolution can create indirect selection for increased recombination.
    Dapper AL; Lively CM
    Evolution; 2014 Apr; 68(4):1216-24. PubMed ID: 24351085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Muller's ratchet, epistasis and mutation effects.
    Butcher D
    Genetics; 1995 Sep; 141(1):431-7. PubMed ID: 8536988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Why are sex and recombination so common?
    Hadany L; Comeron JM
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008; 1133():26-43. PubMed ID: 18559814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.