These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18852102)

  • 1. The genetic code can cause systematic bias in simple phylogenetic models.
    Whelan S
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):4003-11. PubMed ID: 18852102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in nucleotide sequence evolution.
    Whelan S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Aug; 25(8):1683-94. PubMed ID: 18502771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artifactual phylogenies caused by correlated distribution of substitution rates among sites and lineages: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
    Ruano-Rubio V; Fares MA
    Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):68-82. PubMed ID: 17366138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
    McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Codon substitution models based on residue similarity and their applications.
    Liu X; Liu H; Guo W; Yu K
    Gene; 2012 Nov; 509(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 22902303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An empirical codon model for protein sequence evolution.
    Kosiol C; Holmes I; Goldman N
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jul; 24(7):1464-79. PubMed ID: 17400572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of genetic convergence on phylogenetic inference.
    Christin PA; Besnard G; Edwards EJ; Salamin N
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Mar; 62(3):921-7. PubMed ID: 22197805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Likelihood-based clustering (LiBaC) for codon models, a method for grouping sites according to similarities in the underlying process of evolution.
    Bao L; Gu H; Dunn KA; Bielawski JP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Sep; 25(9):1995-2007. PubMed ID: 18586695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Bayesian model comparison approach to inferring positive selection.
    Scheffler K; Seoighe C
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2531-40. PubMed ID: 16120799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An amino acid substitution-selection model adjusts residue fitness to improve phylogenetic estimation.
    Wang HC; Susko E; Roger AJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Apr; 31(4):779-92. PubMed ID: 24441033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of phylogenetic uncertainty on the detection of positive Darwinian selection.
    Pie MR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Dec; 23(12):2274-8. PubMed ID: 16971694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modelling heterotachy in phylogenetic inference by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo.
    Pagel M; Meade A
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):3955-64. PubMed ID: 18852097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phylogenetic mixture models can reduce node-density artifacts.
    Venditti C; Meade A; Pagel M
    Syst Biol; 2008 Apr; 57(2):286-93. PubMed ID: 18432549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the robustness of phylogenetic methods to among-site variability in substitution processes.
    Holder MT; Zwickl DJ; Dessimoz C
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):4013-21. PubMed ID: 18852108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamically heterogenous partitions and phylogenetic inference: an evaluation of analytical strategies with cytochrome b and ND6 gene sequences in cranes.
    Krajewski C; Fain MG; Buckley L; King DG
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1999 Nov; 13(2):302-13. PubMed ID: 10603258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of rate estimation using relaxed-clock models with a critical focus on the early metazoan radiation.
    Ho SY; Phillips MJ; Drummond AJ; Cooper A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1355-63. PubMed ID: 15758207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic algorithm-based maximum-likelihood analysis for molecular phylogeny.
    Katoh K; Kuma K; Miyata T
    J Mol Evol; 2001; 53(4-5):477-84. PubMed ID: 11675608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
    García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous.
    Kolaczkowski B; Thornton JW
    Nature; 2004 Oct; 431(7011):980-4. PubMed ID: 15496922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Towards realistic codon models: among site variability and dependency of synonymous and non-synonymous rates.
    Mayrose I; Doron-Faigenboim A; Bacharach E; Pupko T
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):i319-27. PubMed ID: 17646313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.