70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1885271)
1. Geometric quantitative coronary arteriography. A comparison of unsubtracted and dual energy-subtracted images.
Weber DM; Molloi SY; Folts JD; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA
Invest Radiol; 1991 Jul; 26(7):649-54. PubMed ID: 1885271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative dual-energy coronary arteriography.
Molloi SY; Weber DM; Peppler WW; Folts JD; Mistretta CA
Invest Radiol; 1990 Aug; 25(8):908-14. PubMed ID: 2394574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absolute cross-sectional area measurements in quantitative coronary arteriography by dual-energy DSA.
Molloi SY; Ersahin A; Roeck WW; Nalcioglu O
Invest Radiol; 1991 Feb; 26(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 2055711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative coronary angiography using image recovery techniques for background estimation in unsubtracted images.
Wong JT; Kamyar F; Molloi S
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):4003-15. PubMed ID: 17985646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In-vivo validation of videodensitometric coronary cross-sectional area measurement using dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
Molloi S; Ersahin A; Hicks J; Wallis J
Int J Card Imaging; 1995 Dec; 11(4):223-31. PubMed ID: 8596060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correction of photon attenuation and collimator response for a body-contouring SPECT/CT imaging system.
Seo Y; Wong KH; Sun M; Franc BL; Hawkins RA; Hasegawa BH
J Nucl Med; 2005 May; 46(5):868-77. PubMed ID: 15872362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of quantitative coronary angiography in a cineless environment: in vivo assessment of a fully automated system for clinical use.
Cusma JT; Spero LA; van der Geest RJ; Bashore TM; Morris KG
Am Heart J; 1995 Feb; 129(2):300-6. PubMed ID: 7832103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [A digital subtraction angiography system based on LUT algorithms].
Chen X; Li K; Zhou L; Chen J
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Apr; 23(2):433-7. PubMed ID: 16706383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acquisition-related motion compensation for digital subtraction angiography.
Ionasec RI; Heigl B; Hornegger J
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Jun; 33(4):256-66. PubMed ID: 19231134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A quantitative analysis of 3-D coronary modeling from two or more projection images.
Movassaghi B; Rasche V; Grass M; Viergever MA; Niessen WJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Dec; 23(12):1517-31. PubMed ID: 15575409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spectral coronary multidetector computed tomography angiography: dual benefit by facilitating plaque characterization and enhancing lumen depiction.
Boll DT; Hoffmann MH; Huber N; Bossert AS; Aschoff AJ; Fleiter TR
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006; 30(5):804-11. PubMed ID: 16954934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A shape-based segmentation algorithm for X-ray digital subtraction angiography images.
Franchi D; Gallo P; Marsili L; Placidi G
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Jun; 94(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 19264373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there an effect of flat-panel-based imaging systems on quantitative coronary and vascular angiography?
Tuinenburg JC; Koning G; Seppenwoolde Y; Reiber JH
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Oct; 68(4):561-6. PubMed ID: 16969851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
Pantos I; Efstathopoulos EP; Katritsis DG
Cardiol Clin; 2009 Aug; 27(3):491-502. PubMed ID: 19573720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of the K-edge digital subtraction angiography imaging system at the European synchrotron radiation facility.
Peterzol A; Bravin A; Coan P; Elleaume H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):44-9. PubMed ID: 16461532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of subtraction technique in Gd-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic aorta.
O'Connell MJ; Murray JG
Clin Radiol; 2001 Jul; 56(7):545-9. PubMed ID: 11446751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A correlated noise reduction algorithm for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
McCollough CH; Van Lysel MS; Peppler WW; Mistretta CA
Med Phys; 1989; 16(6):873-80. PubMed ID: 2586373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Left ventricular dual-energy digital subtraction angiography: a motion immune digital subtraction technique.
Van Lysel MS; Miller WP; Senior DG; Gupta VK; Ende DJ; Albright DJ
Int J Card Imaging; 1991; 7(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 1753160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonrigid registration with tissue-dependent filtering of the deformation field.
Staring M; Klein S; Pluim JP
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 52(23):6879-92. PubMed ID: 18029981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new approach for the quantification of complex lesion morphology: the gradient field transform; basic principles and validation results.
van der Zwet PM; Reiber JH
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Jul; 24(1):216-24. PubMed ID: 8006269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
