These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1885274)

  • 1. A comparison of iohexol and diatrizoate-meglumine in children undergoing cardiac catheterization.
    Pelech AN; Allard SM; Hurd RT; Giddins NG; Collins GF
    Invest Radiol; 1991 Jul; 26(7):665-70. PubMed ID: 1885274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents.
    Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Bhargava V; Stein JB; Lew W; Slutsky RA; Shabetai R; Higgins CB
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multicenter trial of ionic versus nonionic contrast media for cardiac angiography. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
    Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; Van Fossen DB; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Ludbrook PA; Wexler L; Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S
    Am J Cardiol; 1993 Oct; 72(11):770-5. PubMed ID: 8213508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects.
    Higgins CB; Mancini GB; Bloomquist JN; Shaw D
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983; 366():111-4. PubMed ID: 6591736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents in cardiac catheterization: the effects of ventriculography and coronary arteriography on hemodynamics, electrocardiography, and serum creatinine.
    Cooper MW; Reed PJ
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 Apr; 22(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 1781822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative effects of ionic and nonionic contrast materials on indexes of isovolumic contraction and relaxation in humans.
    Mancini GB; Atwood JE; Bhargava V; Slutsky RA; Grover M; Higgins CB
    Am J Cardiol; 1984 Jan; 53(1):228-33. PubMed ID: 6691265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
    Bernardino ME; Fishman EK; Jeffrey RB; Brown PC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of high (sodium meglumine diatrizoate, Renografin-76) and low osmolar (sodium meglumine ioxaglate, Hexabrix) radiographic contrast media on diastolic function during left ventriculography in patients.
    Aguirre FV; Pedersen W; Castello R; Deligonul U; Gudipati C; Serota H; Labovitz AJ; Kern MJ
    Am Heart J; 1991 Mar; 121(3 Pt 1):848-57. PubMed ID: 2000752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent.
    Bettmann MA; Bourdillon PD; Barry WH; Brush KA; Levin DC
    Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):583-7. PubMed ID: 6387783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nephrotoxicity of ionic and nonionic contrast media in 1196 patients: a randomized trial. The Iohexol Cooperative Study.
    Rudnick MR; Goldfarb S; Wexler L; Ludbrook PA; Murphy MJ; Halpern EF; Hill JA; Winniford M; Cohen MB; VanFossen DB
    Kidney Int; 1995 Jan; 47(1):254-61. PubMed ID: 7731155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Double-blind study of a new nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography.
    Reagan K; Bettman MA; Finkelstein J; Ganz P; Grassi CJ
    Radiology; 1988 May; 167(2):409-13. PubMed ID: 3282261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of intravenous administration of ionic and nonionic contrast materials. Implications for deriving physiologic measurements from computed tomography and digital cardiovascular imaging.
    Higgins CB; Gerber KH; Mattrey RF; Slutsky RA
    Radiology; 1982 Mar; 142(3):681-6. PubMed ID: 7063684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of an ionic with a nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Results of a multicenter trial.
    Bettmann MA; Higgins CB
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S70-4. PubMed ID: 3882619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography with iohexol (Omnipaque) and sodium meglumin diatrizoate (Urografin).
    Karle A; Fries J; Laulund S; Andrew E
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(6):352-9. PubMed ID: 3545629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography.
    Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Chiu D; Akin JR; Hu C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A double-blind randomized clinical study of the safety, tolerability and efficacy of Hexabrix in pediatric angiocardiography.
    Anthony CL; Tonkin IL; Marin-Garcia J; Paul RN; Bell ED; Brooks E; Eastham ED; Fowler SL
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6 Suppl):S335-43. PubMed ID: 6392163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double-blind comparison of the clinical, hemodynamic, and electrocardiographic effects of sodium meglumine ioxaglate or iohexol during diagnostic cardiac catheterization.
    Petersen R; McKay CR; Kawanishi DT; Kotlewski A; Parise K; Niland JC
    Angiology; 1992 Sep; 43(9):765-80. PubMed ID: 1514713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of low- with high-osmolality contrast agents in cardiac angiography. Identification of criteria for selective use.
    Matthai WH; Kussmaul WG; Krol J; Goin JE; Schwartz JS; Hirshfeld JW
    Circulation; 1994 Jan; 89(1):291-301. PubMed ID: 8281660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the systemic responses to rapid intravenous injections of ioxilan, iohexol, and diatrizoate in rabbits.
    Morris TW; Prentice L; Ventura J
    Invest Radiol; 1989 Apr; 24(4):294-7. PubMed ID: 2745009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of meglumine sodium diatrizoate, iopamidol, and iohexol for coronary angiography and ventriculography.
    Murdock CJ; Davis MJ; Ireland MA; Gibbons FA; Cope GD
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Mar; 19(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 2180577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.