These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 188531)

  • 1. Tween 80: a marker for differentiation of hog cholera and bovine viral diarrhea viruses.
    Tessler J; Stewart WC; Kresse JI; Snyder ML
    Can J Comp Med; 1977 Jan; 41(1):127-9. PubMed ID: 188531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in pathogenicity and antigenicity among hog cholera virus strains.
    Kamijo Y; Ohkuma SI; Shimizu M; Shimizu Y
    Natl Inst Anim Health Q (Tokyo); 1977; 17(4):133-40. PubMed ID: 203871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stabilization of hog cholera virus by dimethyl sulfoxide.
    Tessler J; Stewart WC; Kresse JI
    Can J Comp Med; 1975 Oct; 39(4):472-3. PubMed ID: 1236769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Natural infection of pigs with bovine viral diarrhea virus and its differential diagnosis from hog cholera.
    Carbrey EA; Stewart WC; Kresse JI; Snyder ML
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1976 Dec; 169(11):1217-9. PubMed ID: 187565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity of swine buffy coat culture to infection with hog cholera virus.
    Kresse JI; Stewart WC; Carbrey EA; Snyder ML
    Am J Vet Res; 1976 Nov; 37(11):1315-8. PubMed ID: 984563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The capacity of strain TVM2 of bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) virus, at different passage level in cell culture, to protect pigs against hog cholera (HC) virus.
    Castrucci G; Torlone V; Cilli V; Titoli F; Valente C
    Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1973; 52(2):85-8. PubMed ID: 4795978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inhibition of hog cholera virus by acriflavine. A property shared with bovine virus diarrhoea virus. Brief report.
    Diderholm H; Hyllseth B; Dinter Z
    Arch Gesamte Virusforsch; 1973; 42(3):300-2. PubMed ID: 4356773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protection of piglets born from ruminant pestivirus experimentally infected sows, and their contacts, to the challenge with hog cholera virus.
    Leforban Y; Vannier P; Cariolet R
    Ann Rech Vet; 1992; 23(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 1324630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Multiplication and spread of hog cholera virus, Strain Munich-1, in PK-15 cell cultures].
    Danner K; Bachmann PA
    Zentralbl Veterinarmed B; 1970 Mar; 17(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 4932940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Properties of hog cholera viruses recently isolated in Japan.
    Shimizu M; Shimizu Y
    Natl Inst Anim Health Q (Tokyo); 1983; 23(3):103-4. PubMed ID: 6330573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Border disease-like syndrome in lambs: antibodies to hog cholera and bovine viral diarrhea viruses.
    Osburn BI; Clarke GL; Stewart WC; Sawyer M
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1973 Nov; 163(10):1165-7. PubMed ID: 4201826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Immunological relationship between bovine viral diarrhea (BVD) virus and hog cholera (HC) virus. Influence of the strain of HC virus in cross immunity tests in swine].
    Castrucci G; Torlone V; Cilli V; Titoli F; Valente C
    Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1973; 52(4):309-14. PubMed ID: 4591324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hog cholera: replication of hog cholera virus in tissue culture with cytopathic effect.
    Crawford JG; Dayhuff TR; Gallian MJ
    Am J Vet Res; 1968 Sep; 29(9):1733-9. PubMed ID: 5691742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development and evaluation of an enzyme-labeled antibody test for the rapid detection of hog cholera antibodies.
    Saunders GC
    Am J Vet Res; 1977 Jan; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 319715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Isoelectric focusing of hog cholera virus.
    Laude H
    Ann Rech Vet; 1977; 8(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 18081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Swine buffy coat culture: an aid to the laboratory diagnosis of hog cholera.
    Kresse JI; Stewart WC; Carbrey EA; Snyder ML
    Am J Vet Res; 1975 Feb; 36(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 163064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of a cell line contaminated with hog cholera virus.
    Bolin SR; Black JW; Frey ML; Katz JB; Ridpath JF; Roblin RO
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1994 Sep; 205(5):742-5. PubMed ID: 7989247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hog cholera virus : sensitivity to hydrolytic enzymes.
    Laude H
    Ann Rech Vet; 1977; 8(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 560170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SEROLOGICAL COMPARISON WITH RABBIT ANTISERA OF HOG CHOLERA VIRUS AND BOVINE VIRUS DIARRHEA VIRUS.
    COGGINS L; SEO S
    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 1963 Dec; 114():778-80. PubMed ID: 14115270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A survey of wild swine in the United States for evidence of hog cholera.
    Nettles VF; Corn JL; Erickson GA; Jessup DA
    J Wildl Dis; 1989 Jan; 25(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 2536850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.