These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18853355)

  • 1. Penalized likelihood phylogenetic inference: bridging the parsimony-likelihood gap.
    Kim J; Sanderson MJ
    Syst Biol; 2008 Oct; 57(5):665-74. PubMed ID: 18853355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Likelihood, parsimony, and heterogeneous evolution.
    Spencer M; Susko E; Roger AJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1161-4. PubMed ID: 15746012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of rate estimation using relaxed-clock models with a critical focus on the early metazoan radiation.
    Ho SY; Phillips MJ; Drummond AJ; Cooper A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 May; 22(5):1355-63. PubMed ID: 15758207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using models of nucleotide evolution to build phylogenetic trees.
    Bos DH; Posada D
    Dev Comp Immunol; 2005; 29(3):211-27. PubMed ID: 15572070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pitfalls of heterogeneous processes for phylogenetic reconstruction.
    Stefankovic D; Vigoda E
    Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 17366141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Failed refutations: further comments on parsimony and likelihood methods and their relationship to Popper's degree of corroboration.
    de Queiroz K; Poe S
    Syst Biol; 2003 Jun; 52(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 12775524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phylogenetic relationships among iguanian lizards using alternative partitioning methods and TSHZ1: a new phylogenetic marker for reptiles.
    Schulte JA; Cartwright EM
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Feb; 50(2):391-6. PubMed ID: 19026752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Phylogenetic relationships and heterogeneous evolutionary processes among phrynosomatine sand lizards (Squamata, Iguanidae) revisited.
    Schulte JA; de Queiroz K
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 May; 47(2):700-16. PubMed ID: 18362078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The application of model-based complexity inference method to molecular evolution analysis.
    Ren F; Hiroshi T; Okayama T; Gojobori T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():367-71. PubMed ID: 10384480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting hybrid speciation in the presence of incomplete lineage sorting using gene tree incongruence: a model.
    Meng C; Kubatko LS
    Theor Popul Biol; 2009 Feb; 75(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 19038278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A mitogenomic perspective on the phylogeny and biogeography of living caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona).
    Zhang P; Wake MH
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Nov; 53(2):479-91. PubMed ID: 19577653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating trees from filtered data: identifiability of models for morphological phylogenetics.
    Allman ES; Holder MT; Rhodes JA
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Mar; 263(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 20004210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis?
    Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
    Syst Biol; 2008 Feb; 57(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18275003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phylogeny of colletid bees (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) inferred from four nuclear genes.
    Almeida EA; Danforth BN
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Feb; 50(2):290-309. PubMed ID: 18992829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Molecular phylogeny of the Drosophila tripunctata and closely related species groups (Diptera: Drosophilidae).
    Hatadani LM; McInerney JO; de Medeiros HF; Junqueira AC; de Azeredo-Espin AM; Klaczko LB
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Jun; 51(3):595-600. PubMed ID: 19285146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Coalescent methods for estimating phylogenetic trees.
    Liu L; Yu L; Kubatko L; Pearl DK; Edwards SV
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2009 Oct; 53(1):320-8. PubMed ID: 19501178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maximum-likelihood methods for phylogeny estimation.
    Sullivan J
    Methods Enzymol; 2005; 395():757-79. PubMed ID: 15865994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fundamental differences between the methods of maximum likelihood and maximum posterior probability in phylogenetics.
    Svennblad B; Erixon P; Oxelman B; Britton T
    Syst Biol; 2006 Feb; 55(1):116-21. PubMed ID: 16507528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study in ancestral range reconstruction methods: retracing the uncertain histories of insular lineages.
    Clark JR; Ree RH; Alfaro ME; King MG; Wagner WL; Roalson EH
    Syst Biol; 2008 Oct; 57(5):693-707. PubMed ID: 18853357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of tree shape on the accuracy of maximum likelihood-based ancestor reconstructions.
    Mooers AO
    Syst Biol; 2004 Oct; 53(5):809-14. PubMed ID: 15545257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.