These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18853555)

  • 41. Computational models of facial attractiveness judgments.
    Bronstad PM; Langlois JH; Russell R
    Perception; 2008; 37(1):126-42. PubMed ID: 18399252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of inversion and negation on social inferences from faces.
    Santos IM; Young AW
    Perception; 2008; 37(7):1061-78. PubMed ID: 18773729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Facial attractiveness: is the whole more than the sum of its parts?
    Sharabi SE; Hatef DA; Hollier LH
    Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Mar; 30(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 20442090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Ensemble perception of facial attractiveness.
    Luo AX; Zhou G
    J Vis; 2018 Aug; 18(8):7. PubMed ID: 30105386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Judgments of facial attractiveness as a combination of facial parts information over time: Social and aesthetic factors.
    Saegusa C; Watanabe K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Feb; 42(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 26460871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Electrophysiological correlates of the composite face illusion: disentangling perceptual and decisional components of holistic face processing in the human brain.
    Kuefner D; Jacques C; Prieto EA; Rossion B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Dec; 74(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 20851511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. What aspects of face processing are impaired in developmental prosopagnosia?
    Le Grand R; Cooper PA; Mondloch CJ; Lewis TL; Sagiv N; de Gelder B; Maurer D
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Jul; 61(2):139-58. PubMed ID: 16466839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Discrepant integration times for upright and inverted faces.
    Arnold DH; Lipp OV
    Perception; 2011; 40(8):989-99. PubMed ID: 22132513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Facial attractiveness biases the perception of eye contact.
    Kloth N; Altmann CS; Schweinberger SR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1906-18. PubMed ID: 21756185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Judged attractiveness in recognition memory of women's faces.
    Fleishman JJ; Buckley ML; Klosinsky MJ; Smith N; Tuck B
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Dec; 43(3 pt. 1):709-10. PubMed ID: 1012858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. When beauty breaks down: investigation of the effect of spatial quantisation on aesthetic evaluation of facial images.
    Bachmann T
    Perception; 2007; 36(6):840-9. PubMed ID: 17718363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Different processes in attractiveness assessments for unattractive and highly attractive faces-The role of presentation duration and rotation.
    Stróżak P; Zielińska M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102946. PubMed ID: 31693937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Early holistic face-like processing of Arcimboldo paintings in the right occipito-temporal cortex: evidence from the N170 ERP component.
    Caharel S; Leleu A; Bernard C; Viggiano MP; Lalonde R; Rebaï M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Nov; 90(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 23816562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Face perception is whole or none: disentangling the role of spatial contiguity and interfeature distances in the composite face illusion.
    Laguesse R; Rossion B
    Perception; 2013; 42(10):1013-26. PubMed ID: 24494433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Rigid facial motion influences featural, but not holistic, face processing.
    Xiao NG; Quinn PC; Ge L; Lee K
    Vision Res; 2012 Mar; 57():26-34. PubMed ID: 22342561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Interactions among the effects of head orientation, emotional expression, and physical attractiveness on face preferences.
    Main JC; DeBruine LM; Little AC; Jones BC
    Perception; 2010; 39(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 20301847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The composite-face effect survives asymmetric face distortions.
    de Heering A; Wallis J; Maurer D
    Perception; 2012; 41(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 23094459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Does temporal integration of face parts reflect holistic processing?
    Cheung OS; Richler JJ; Phillips WS; Gauthier I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Jun; 18(3):476-83. PubMed ID: 21327378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Individuation and holistic processing of faces in rhesus monkeys.
    Dahl CD; Logothetis NK; Hoffman KL
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Sep; 274(1622):2069-76. PubMed ID: 17609192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Electrophysiological correlates of processing facial attractiveness and its influence on cooperative behavior.
    Chen J; Zhong J; Zhang Y; Li P; Zhang A; Tan Q; Li H
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 May; 517(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 22410307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.