These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1885391)

  • 1. Effects of selection of data on estimates of breeding values by three methods for litter size, backfat, and average daily gain in swine.
    Long TE; Johnson RK; Keele JW
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Jul; 69(7):2787-94. PubMed ID: 1885391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of errors in pedigree on three methods of estimating breeding value for litter size, backfat and average daily gain in swine.
    Long TE; Johnson RK; Keele JW
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Dec; 68(12):4069-78. PubMed ID: 2286549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Animal model estimation of genetic parameters and response to selection for litter size and weight, growth, and backfat in closed seedstock populations of large white and Landrace swine.
    Ferraz JB; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1993 Apr; 71(4):850-8. PubMed ID: 8478287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effect of population size of performance test on short-term selection result of sire line].
    Zhang H; Li JQ; Wang C; Liu XH; Chen YS
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Jul; 32(7):696-703. PubMed ID: 16078737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic and phenotypic trends in Polish large white nucleus swine herds.
    Kaplon MJ; Rothschild MF; Berger PJ; Healey M
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Feb; 69(2):551-8. PubMed ID: 2016185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of methods of estimating variance components in pigs.
    Keele JW; Long TE; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Apr; 69(4):1428-34. PubMed ID: 2071508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selection line x diet interactions for two lines of pigs fed 12 or 24% protein diets.
    Bereskin B; Steele NC; Mitchell AD
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Apr; 68(4):944-59. PubMed ID: 2332394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genetic parameters and trends for production traits and their relationship with litter traits in Landrace and Yorkshire pigs.
    Lopez BIM; Song C; Seo K
    Anim Sci J; 2018 Oct; 89(10):1381-1388. PubMed ID: 30073716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detecting effective starting point of genomic selection by divergent trends from best linear unbiased prediction and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in pigs, beef cattle, and broilers.
    Abdollahi-Arpanahi R; Lourenco D; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Sep; 99(9):. PubMed ID: 34390341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternal effects on traits measured during postweaning performance test of swine from four breeds.
    Johnson ZB; Chewning JJ; Nugent RA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Jun; 80(6):1470-7. PubMed ID: 12078726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic parameter estimates of meat quality traits in Duroc pigs selected for average daily gain, longissimus muscle area, backfat thickness, and intramuscular fat content.
    Suzuki K; Irie M; Kadowaki H; Shibata T; Kumagai M; Nishida A
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Sep; 83(9):2058-65. PubMed ID: 16100060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multivariate analysis of litter size for multiple parities with production traits in pigs: II. Response to selection for litter size and correlated response to production traits.
    Noguera JL; Varona L; Babot D; Estany J
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Oct; 80(10):2548-55. PubMed ID: 12413076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic analyses of growth, real-time ultrasound, carcass, and pork quality traits in Duroc and Landrace pigs: II. Heritabilities and correlations.
    Lo LL; McLaren DG; McKeith FK; Fernando RL; Novakofski J
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2387-96. PubMed ID: 1506302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Responses to 19 generations of litter size selection in the NE Index line. II. Growth and carcass responses estimated in pure line and crossbred litters.
    Petry DB; Holl JW; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Jul; 82(7):1895-902. PubMed ID: 15309934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlated responses in reproductive and carcass traits to selection for 200-day weight in Duroc swine.
    Kuhlers DL; Jungst SB
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Sep; 70(9):2707-13. PubMed ID: 1399885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results from nine generations of selection for increased litter size in swine.
    Holl JW; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Mar; 81(3):624-9. PubMed ID: 12661642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Using VCE4.0 package to estimate genetic parameters on growth traits in Landrace].
    Wang QL; Wang AG; Zhang H; Luo XF; Wu ZF
    Yi Chuan; 2004 Nov; 26(6):811-4. PubMed ID: 15640108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction of performance of progeny from test station boars.
    van Alst G; Robison OW
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jul; 70(7):2078-85. PubMed ID: 1644681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selection on individual phenotype and best linear unbiased predictor of breeding value in a closed swine herd.
    Belonsky GM; Kennedy BW
    J Anim Sci; 1988 May; 66(5):1124-31. PubMed ID: 3397339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of direct and maternal heritability and genetic correlation for backfat and growth rate in swine using data from centrally tested Yorkshire boars.
    Bryner SM; Mabry JW; Bertrand JK; Benyshek LL; Kriese LA
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Jun; 70(6):1755-9. PubMed ID: 1634399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.