163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18854110)
1. A prospective randomized controlled trial of Wallace and Rocket embryo transfer catheters.
El-Shawarby SA; Ravhon A; Skull J; Ellenbogen A; Trew G; Lavery S
Reprod Biomed Online; 2008 Oct; 17(4):549-52. PubMed ID: 18854110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Embryo transfer using the SureView catheter-beacon in the womb.
Allahbadia GN; Kadam K; Gandhi G; Arora S; Valliappan JB; Joshi A; Allahbadia S; Wolman I
Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):344-50. PubMed ID: 19268930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomized comparison of the Wallace catheter and the Cook Echo-Tip catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer.
Karande V; Hazlett D; Vietzke M; Gleicher N
Fertil Steril; 2002 Apr; 77(4):826-30. PubMed ID: 11937141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective randomized comparison of Wallace and Labotect embryo transfer catheters.
Ata B; Isiklar A; Balaban B; Urman B
Reprod Biomed Online; 2007 Apr; 14(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 17425830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of using an echogenic catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in an IVF programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Coroleu B; Barri PN; Carreras O; Belil I; Buxaderas R; Veiga A; Balasch J
Hum Reprod; 2006 Jul; 21(7):1809-15. PubMed ID: 16556674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The choice of embryo transfer catheter affects embryo implantation after IVF.
Meriano J; Weissman A; Greenblatt EM; Ward S; Casper RF
Fertil Steril; 2000 Oct; 74(4):678-82. PubMed ID: 11020506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review and meta-analysis of prospective trials comparing different catheters used for embryo transfer.
Buckett WM
Fertil Steril; 2006 Mar; 85(3):728-34. PubMed ID: 16500345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Firm versus soft embryo transfer catheters under ultrasound guidance: does catheter choice really influence the pregnancy rates?
Aboulfotouh I; Abou-Setta AM; Khattab S; Mohsen IA; Askalani A; El-Din RE
Fertil Steril; 2008 May; 89(5):1261-1262. PubMed ID: 17644096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of ease of transfer and type of catheter used on pregnancy and implantation rates in an IVF program.
De Placido G; Wilding M; Stina I; Mollo A; Alviggi E; Tolino A; Colacurci N; De ML; Marino M; Dale B
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2002 Jan; 19(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 11893010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing two embryo transfer catheters. Use of a trial transfer to determine the catheter applied.
Urman B; Aksoy S; Alatas C; Mercan R; Nuhoglu A; Isiklar A; Balaban B
J Reprod Med; 2000 Feb; 45(2):135-8. PubMed ID: 10710745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The efficacy of the embryo transfer catheter in IVF and ICSI is operator-dependent: a randomized clinical trial.
Yao Z; Vansteelandt S; Van der Elst J; Coetsier T; Dhont M; De Sutter P
Hum Reprod; 2009 Apr; 24(4):880-7. PubMed ID: 19095665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effect of catheter choice during embryo transfer on the clinical outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer].
Ren XL; Liu P; Lian Y; Huang J; Zheng XY; Zhu YJ; Qiao J
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Oct; 48(5):905-909. PubMed ID: 27752179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of different embryo transfer catheters in a human in vitro fertilization program.
Wisanto A; Janssens R; Deschacht J; Camus M; Devroey P; Van Steirteghem AC
Fertil Steril; 1989 Jul; 52(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 2744191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marked improvement in clinical pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer seen when transfer technique and catheter were changed.
Choe JK; Nazari A; Check JH; Summers-Chase D; Swenson K
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2001; 28(4):223-4. PubMed ID: 11838743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cook versus Edwards-Wallace: are there differences in flexible catheters?
Boone WR; Johnson JE; Blackhurst DM; Crane MM
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2001 Jan; 18(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 11292989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Transfer technique and catheter choice influence the incidence of transcervical embryo expulsion and the outcome of IVF.
Ghazzawi IM; Al-Hasani S; Karaki R; Souso S
Hum Reprod; 1999 Mar; 14(3):677-82. PubMed ID: 10221694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Wallace malleable stylet for difficult embryo transfer in an in vitro fertilization program: a case-control study.
Nielsen IK; Lindhard A; Loft A; Ziebe S; Andersen AN
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Feb; 81(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11942903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing two embryo transfer catheters in an ART program.
Saldeen P; Abou-Setta AM; Bergh T; Sundström P; Holte J
Fertil Steril; 2008 Sep; 90(3):599-603. PubMed ID: 18054000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ultrasound-guided soft catheter embryo transfers will improve pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization.
Wood EG; Batzer FR; Go KJ; Gutmann JN; Corson SL
Hum Reprod; 2000 Jan; 15(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 10611197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Impact of embryo transfer techniques on implantation rates].
Frydman R
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2004 Feb; 33(1 Pt 2):S36-9. PubMed ID: 14968044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
