346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18855136)
1. Increasing incidence of breast cancer: distinguishing between the effects of birth cohort and a national breast screening programme.
Brown SB; Morrison DS; Cooke TG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Aug; 116(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 18855136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast cancer detection rates, and standardised detection ratios for prevalence screening in the New Zealand breast cancer screening programme.
Richardson A; Graham P; Brown T; Smale P; Cox B
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 15153320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer incidence trends in deprived and affluent Scottish women.
Brown SB; Hole DJ; Cooke TG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jun; 103(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 17033918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Breast complaints during the Dutch nationwide breast cancer screening program: increased risk of referral and of breast cancer].
van Bon-Martens MJ; Klingenberg H; Dijkstra HA; Peeters PH
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jun; 145(22):1067-71. PubMed ID: 11414168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer, birth cohorts, and Epstein-Barr virus: methodological issues in exploring the "hygiene hypothesis" in relation to breast cancer, Hodgkin's disease, and stomach cancer.
Krieger N; Strong EF; Makosky C; Weuve J
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 May; 12(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 12750234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Changing patterns in breast cancer incidence trends.
Holford TR; Cronin KA; Mariotto AB; Feuer EJ
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2006; (36):19-25. PubMed ID: 17032890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The clinical and pathological differences in prevalent round screen-detected and symptomatic invasive breast cancer.
Sweeney KJ; Kell MR; Aziz NA; Prunty N; Holloway P; Kennedy M; Flanagan F; Kerin MJ
Ir Med J; 2007 Sep; 100(8):550-2. PubMed ID: 17955686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ascertainment of breast cancer by the Scottish Cancer Registry: an assessment based on comparison with five independent breast cancer trials databases.
Brewster DH; Stockton DL
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):104-6. PubMed ID: 17855094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Audit of a breast cancer screening programme using clinical examination and lightscanning.
Braddick MR
Health Bull (Edinb); 1991 Nov; 49(6):299-303. PubMed ID: 1765479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening caused rising incidence rates of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
van Steenbergen LN; Voogd AC; Roukema JA; Louwman WJ; Duijm LE; Coebergh JW; van de Poll-Franse LV
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 May; 115(1):181-3. PubMed ID: 18516674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer incidence and mortality in the Nordic capitals, 1970-1998. Trends related to mammography screening programmes.
Törnberg S; Kemetli L; Lynge E; Helene Olsen A; Hofvind S; Wang H; Anttila A; Hakama M; Nyström L
Acta Oncol; 2006; 45(5):528-35. PubMed ID: 16864165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Incidence and prognostic factors of breast cancer diagnosed within and outside of the organised screening program in the department of Loire-Atlantique (1991-2002)].
Molinié F; Billon-Delacour S; Allioux C; Blais S; Bercelli P; Lombrail P
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Feb; 56(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18295424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Determinants of compliance in a cluster randomised controlled trial on screening of breast and cervix cancer in Mumbai, India. 1. Compliance to screening.
Dinshaw K; Mishra G; Shastri S; Badwe R; Kerkar R; Ramani S; Thakur M; Uplap P; Kakade A; Gupta S; Ganesh B
Oncology; 2007; 73(3-4):145-53. PubMed ID: 18408401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Significant difference in the trends of female breast cancer incidence between Taiwanese and Caucasian Americans: implications from age-period-cohort analysis.
Shen YC; Chang CJ; Hsu C; Cheng CC; Chiu CF; Cheng AL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Aug; 14(8):1986-90. PubMed ID: 16103449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inequalities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis in the Trent region, and implications for the NHS Breast Screening Programme.
Cuthbertson SA; Goyder EC; Poole J
J Public Health (Oxf); 2009 Sep; 31(3):398-405. PubMed ID: 19423544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast cancer stage, social class and the impact of screening.
Roberts MM; Alexander FE; Elton RA; Rodger A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1990 Feb; 16(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 2407559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer trends in Manitoba: 40 years of follow-up.
Demers AA; Turner D; Mo D; Kliewer EV
Chronic Dis Can; 2005; 26(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 16117841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is breast cancer incidence increasing among young women? An analysis of the trend in France for the period 1983-2002.
Colonna M; Delafosse P; Uhry Z; Poncet F; Arveux P; Molinie F; Cherie-Challine L; Grosclaude P;
Breast; 2008 Jun; 17(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 18053721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Demographics (1950-1987) of breast cancer in birth cohorts of older women.
Manton KG; Stallard E
J Gerontol; 1992 Nov; 47 Spec No():32-42. PubMed ID: 1430880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
