147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18855300)
1. [Clinical value of computer-assisted analysis in MR mammography. A comparison between two systems and three observers with different levels of experience].
Renz DM; Baltzer PA; Kullnig PE; Böttcher J; Vag T; Gajda M; Camara O; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2008 Nov; 180(11):968-76. PubMed ID: 18855300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nonmasslike enhancement at breast MR imaging: the added value of mammography and US for lesion categorization.
Thomassin-Naggara I; Trop I; Chopier J; David J; Lalonde L; Darai E; Rouzier R; Uzan S
Radiology; 2011 Oct; 261(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 21771958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Is the application of CAD useful for radiologists for passing the official tests required for outpatient breast imaging?].
Malich A; Beier A; Bank P; Gorna R
Rofo; 2007 Jan; 179(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 17203444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
Gökalp G; Topal U
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast masses: computer-aided diagnosis with serial mammograms.
Hadjiiski L; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Chan HP; Roubidoux MA; Paramagul C; Blane C; Petrick N; Bailey J; Klein K; Foster M; Patterson SK; Adler D; Nees AV; Shen J
Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):343-56. PubMed ID: 16801362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-assisted diagnosis in full-field digital mammography--results in dependence of readers experiences.
Sohns C; Angic B; Sossalla S; Konietschke F; Obenauer S
Breast J; 2010; 16(5):490-7. PubMed ID: 20642459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection and classification of contrast-enhancing masses by a fully automatic computer-assisted diagnosis system for breast MRI.
Renz DM; Böttcher J; Diekmann F; Poellinger A; Maurer MH; Pfeil A; Streitparth F; Collettini F; Bick U; Hamm B; Fallenberg EM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 May; 35(5):1077-88. PubMed ID: 22247104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Potential effect of different radiologist reporting methods on studies showing benefit of CAD.
Horsch K; Giger ML; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):139-52. PubMed ID: 18206613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography in a clinical population: performance of radiologist and technologists.
van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Boetes C; Flobbe K
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Apr; 120(2):499-506. PubMed ID: 19418215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CAD in full-field digital mammography-influence of reader experience and application of CAD on interpretation of time.
Sohns C; Angic BC; Sossalla S; Konietschke F; Obenauer S
Clin Imaging; 2010; 34(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 21092870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations.
Kettritz U; Morack G; Decker T
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 16036159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice.
Mendez A; Cabanillas F; Echenique M; Malekshamran K; Perez I; Ramos E
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 14770425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast-enhanced MR mammography: improved lesion detection and differentiation with gadobenate dimeglumine.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Padula S; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G; Passariello R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1339-46. PubMed ID: 18941066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
